Motivational Interviewing

Substance Use Prevention or Treatment Well-Supported

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a method of counseling clients designed to promote behavior change and improve physiological, psychological, and lifestyle outcomes. MI aims to identify ambivalence for change and increase motivation by helping clients progress through five stages of change: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. It aims to do this by encouraging clients to consider their personal goals and how their current behaviors may compete with attainment of those goals. MI uses clinical strategies to help clients identify reasons to change their behavior and reinforce that behavior change is possible. These clinical strategies include the use of open-ended questions and reflective listening. MI can be used to promote behavior change with a range of target populations and for a variety of problem areas. The Prevention Services Clearinghouse reviewed studies of MI focused on illicit substance and alcohol use or abuse among youth and adults, and nicotine or tobacco use among youth under the age of 18. MI is typically delivered over one to three sessions with each session lasting about 30 to 50 minutes. Sessions are often used prior to or in conjunction with other therapies or programs. They are usually conducted in community agencies, clinical office settings, care facilities, or hospitals. While there are no required qualifications for individuals to deliver MI, training can be provided by MINT (Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers) certified trainers.


MI is rated as a well-supported practice because at least two studies with non-overlapping samples carried out in usual care or practice settings achieved a rating of moderate or high on design and execution and demonstrated favorable effects in a target outcome domain. At least one of the studies demonstrated a sustained favorable effect of at least 12 months beyond the end of treatment on at least one target outcome. In accordance with the Handbook of Standards and Procedures, if after review of 15 studies a program or service has not achieved a rating of well-supported, additional studies are reviewed until the program or service has achieved a rating of well-supported or all eligible studies have been reviewed. For Motivational Interviewing, 30 studies were reviewed in depth, in order of prioritization.


Date Research Evidence Last Reviewed: Nov 2019


Sources

The program or service description, target population, and program or service delivery and implementation information was informed by the following sources: The California Evidence-based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare, the program or service developer’s website, the program or service manual, and the studies reviewed.

 

Program/Service Webpage Updated: Dec 2020


This information does not necessarily represent the views of the program or service developers. For more information on how this program or service was reviewed, visit the download the Handbook of Standards and Procedures, Version 1.0

Target Population

MI can be used to promote behavior change with a range of target populations and for a variety of problem areas.

Dosage

MI is typically delivered over one to three sessions. Each session typically lasts for 30 to 50 minutes. The dosage may vary if MI is delivered in conjunction with other treatment(s).

Location/Delivery Setting
Recommended Locations/Delivery Settings

MI sessions are usually conducted in community agencies, clinical office settings, care facilities, or hospitals.

Location/Delivery Settings Observed in the Research

  • Hospital/Medical Center
  • School

Education, Certifications and Training

There are no minimum qualifications for MI providers. MI can be used by a variety of different professionals. The Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) does not recommend specific trainings. However, they provide online training resources, contact information for MI trainers, and information about public trainings by MINT members.

Program or Service Documentation
Book/Manual/Available documentation used for review

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational Interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Available languages

Materials for MI are available in many languages including: Bulgarian, Chinese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Estonian, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish, Swedish, and Turkish.

Other supporting materials

MI Network of Trainers (MINT) Site

Motivational Interviewing as a Counseling Style (A book chapter authored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment)

For More Information

Website: https://motivationalinterviewing.org/

Email: admin@motivationalinterviewing.org


Note: The details on Dosage; Location; Education, Certifications, and Training; Other Supporting Materials; and For More Information sections above are provided to website users for informational purposes only. This information is not exhaustive and may be subject to change.

Results of Search and Review Number of Studies Identified and Reviewed for Motivational Interviewing
Identified in Search 206
Eligible for Review 75
Rated High 13
Rated Moderate 8
Rated Low 9
Reviewed Only for Risk of Harm 45

Outcome Effect Size Effect Size more info
and Implied Percentile Effect Implied Percentile Effect more info 		N of Studies (Findings) N of Participants Summary of Findings
Child well-being: Substance use -0.01
0 		5 (33) 1634 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 33
Unfavorable: 0
Adult well-being: Parent/caregiver mental or emotional health 0.00
0 		3 (5) 1464 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 5
Unfavorable: 0
Adult well-being: Parent/caregiver substance use 0.16
6 		15 (109) 6066 Favorable: 16
No Effect: 91
Unfavorable: 2
Adult well-being: Parent/caregiver criminal behavior -0.01
0 		2 (7) 1610 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 7
Unfavorable: 0
Adult well-being: Family functioning 0.10
4 		1 (1) 777 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 1
Unfavorable: 0
Adult well-being: Parent/caregiver physical health 0.00
0 		4 (10) 2158 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 10
Unfavorable: 0
Adult well-being: Economic and housing stability -0.02
0 		1 (1) 777 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 1
Unfavorable: 0

Note: For the effect sizes and implied percentile effects reported in the table, a positive number favors the intervention group and a negative number favors the comparison group. Effect sizes for some outcomes were not able to be calculated by the Prevention Services Clearinghouse.

The findings reported for this program or service are derived from eligible, prioritized studies rated as moderate or high on study design and execution and do not represent the findings from all eligible studies of the program or service. Learn more on the FAQ page.

Outcome Effect Size Effect Size more info
and Implied Percentile Effect Implied Percentile Effect more info 		N of Studies (Findings) N of Participants Summary of Findings Months after treatment
when outcome measured Months after treatment when outcome measured more info
Child well-being: Substance use -0.01
0 		5 (33) 1634 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 33
Unfavorable: 0
 -
Study 10397 - Brief Motivational Intervention vs. TAU (Arnaud, 2017)
Binge Drinking Frequency in Past Month -0.02
0 		- 316 - 2
Binge Drinking Frequency in Past Month 0.08
3 		- 316 - 5
Number of Alcohol Drinks at a Typical Occasion 0.10
3 		- 316 - 2
Number of Alcohol Drinks at a Typical Occasion 0.13
5 		- 316 - 5
Study 10406 - Motivational Intervention vs. Standard Assessed Control (Bernstein, 2010)
Drinking Days Per Month 0.04
1 		- 399 - 3
Mean Drinks Per Drinking Day -0.03
-1 		- 399 - 3
Mean Drinks Per Week -0.04
-1 		- 399 - 3
Maximum Drinks Per Day -0.05
-1 		- 399 - 3
Days Drunk 0.14
5 		- 399 - 3
High on Alcohol -0.02
0 		- 399 - 3
High on Marijuana -0.06
-2 		- 399 - 3
High on Other Drugs 0.13
5 		- 399 - 3
Drinking Days Per Month 0.04
1 		- 416 - 12
Mean Drinks Per Drinking Day 0.07
2 		- 416 - 12
Mean Drinks Per Week 0.08
3 		- 416 - 12
Maximum Drinks Per Day 0.17
6 		- 416 - 12
Days Drunk -0.08
-3 		- 416 - 12
High on Alcohol -0.17
-6 		- 416 - 12
High on Marijuana -0.18
-7 		- 416 - 12
High on Other Drugs 0.03
1 		- 416 - 12
Study 10427 - Brief Motivational Intervention (No Booster) vs. Enhanced Usual Care (Cunningham, 2015)
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C: Alcohol Quantity-Frequency Index Null
not calculated 		- 244 - 6
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C: Alcohol Quantity-Frequency Index Null
not calculated 		- 250 - 12
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C: Alcohol Quantity-Frequency Index Null
not calculated 		- 236 - 3
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C: Alcohol Quantity-Frequency Index Null
not calculated 		- 244 - 9
Study 10272 - Brief MI (CHAT) vs. Enhanced Usual Care (D'Amico, 2018)
Number of Times Used Marijuana on Days of Use 0.04
1 		- 229 - 6
Number of Times Used Alcohol in Past 3 Months 0.16
6 		- 235 - 12
Number of Times Had Heavy Alcohol Use in Past 3 Months 0.13
5 		- 234 - 12
Number of Times Used Marijuana in Past 3 Months -0.14
-5 		- 236 - 12
Maximum Number of Alcoholic Drinks Consumed in Past 30 Days 0.05
1 		- 223 - 12
Number of Times Used Marijuana on Days of Use -0.05
-2 		- 232 - 12
Study 10497 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Treatment as Usual (Palm, 2016)
AUDIT-C Null
not calculated 		- 172 - 12
Frequency of Binge Drinking Null
not calculated 		- 172 - 12
Risky Alcohol Drinking (%) -0.30
-11 		- 172 - 12
Adult well-being: Parent/caregiver mental or emotional health 0.00
0 		3 (5) 1464 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 5
Unfavorable: 0
 -
Study 10446 - Intervention Liaison-Delivered Motivational Interviewing vs. Treatment as Usual (Freyer-Adam, 2008)
Mental Health Inventory-5: Total Score 0.00
0 		- 339 - 12
Study 10302 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Enhanced Care as Usual (Roy-Byrne, 2014)
Addiction Severity Index: Psychiatric Composite Score -0.02
0 		- 777 - 12
Study 10277 - Motivational Interviewing (MOTIV) vs. TAU (Saitz, 2014)
Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): Marijuana Score -0.11
-4 		- 348 - 5
Patient Health Questionnaire-9: % With Depressive Symptoms 0.14
5 		- 348 - 5
Overall Anxiety Severity and Impact Scale: % With Anxiety Symptoms 0.10
3 		- 348 - 5
Adult well-being: Parent/caregiver substance use 0.16
6 		15 (109) 6066 Favorable: 16
No Effect: 91
Unfavorable: 2
 -
Study 10480 - Basic BMI vs. No Treatment Control (Carey, 2006 - Not conducted in a usual care or practice setting)
Number of Drinks Per Day 0.09
3 		- 163 - 1
Number of Drinks Per Week 0.41 *
15 		- 163 - 1
Heavy Drinking Frequency 0.28
10 		- 163 - 1
Peak Blood Alcohol Concentration 0.24
9 		- 155 - 1
Number of Drinks Per Day 0.15
5 		- 134 - 6
Number of Drinks Per Week 0.34
13 		- 134 - 6
Heavy Drinking Frequency 0.19
7 		- 133 - 6
Peak Blood Alcohol Concentration 0.25
9 		- 132 - 6
Number of Drinks Per Day -0.23
-9 		- 123 - 12
Number of Drinks Per Week 0.21
8 		- 123 - 12
Heavy Drinking Frequency -0.01
0 		- 123 - 6
Peak Blood Alcohol Concentration 0.14
5 		- 123 - 12
Study 10435 - Brief Motivational Intervention vs. Self-assessment (Diaz Gomez, 2019)
Number of Standard Drinks Ingested -0.04
-1 		- 155 - 3
Repeated Drunkenness 0.07
2 		- 155 - 3
Any Alcohol Use In Past Month Null
not calculated 		- 156 - 3
Regular Alcohol Use Null
not calculated 		- 156 - 3
Study 10439 - Therapist-Delivered Brief Intervention vs. Enhanced Usual Care (Fernandez, 2019)
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Quantity-Frequency of Alcohol Use 0.10
3 		- 436 - 3
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Quantity-Frequency of Alcohol Use 0.02
0 		- 438 - 6
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Quantity-Frequency of Alcohol Use 0.17
6 		- 432 - 12
Study 10441 - Brief Motivational Interviewing vs. Treatment as Usual (Field, 2010)
Alcohol Volume Per Week 0.05
1 		- 867 - 12
Maximum Amount of Alcohol Consumed in One Day 0.11
4 		- 867 - 12
Percent Days Abstinent from Alcohol 0.06
2 		- 867 - 12
Percent Days with Heavy Drinking 0.08
3 		- 867 - 12
Study 10442 - Brief Motivational Intervention vs. Brief Advice (Field, 2014)
Average Drinks Per Week Null
not calculated 		- 347 - 3
% Days of Heavy Drinking Null
not calculated 		- 347 - 3
Maximum Number of Drinks Per Day Null
not calculated 		- 347 - 3
Average Number of Drinks Per Drinking Day Null
not calculated 		- 347 - 3
Average Drinks Per Week Null
not calculated 		- 318 - 6
% Days of Heavy Drinking Null
not calculated 		- 318 - 6
Maximum Number of Drinks Per Day Null
not calculated 		- 318 - 6
Average Number of Drinks Per Drinking Day Null
not calculated 		- 318 - 6
Average Drinks Per Week Null
not calculated 		- 297 - 12
% Days of Heavy Drinking 0.27 *
10 		- 297 - 12
Maximum Number of Drinks Per Day Null
not calculated 		- 297 - 12
Average Number of Drinks Per Drinking Day Null
not calculated 		- 297 - 12
Study 10446 - Intervention Liaison-Delivered Motivational Interviewing vs. Treatment as Usual (Freyer-Adam, 2008)
Average Daily Alcohol Intake (grams/day) -0.08
-3 		- 339 - 12
Composite International Diagnostic Interview (German): % Diagnosed With Alcohol Abuse 0.17
6 		- 339 - 12
Composite International Diagnostic Interview (German): % with At-Risk Drinking 0.16
6 		- 339 - 12
% Any Heavy Episodic Drinking in Past 12 Months -0.39 *
-15 		- 339 - 12
Any Alcohol Problem (Composite) -0.01
0 		- 339 - 12
Study 10277 - Motivational Interviewing (MOTIV) vs. TAU (Fuster, 2016)
Days Using Main Drug in Past 90 Days Null
not calculated 		- 348 - 5
Study 10448 - Brief Motivational Intervention vs. Waitlist Comparison Group (Gaume, 2011)
Quick Drinking Screen: Standard Drinks Per Week 0.07
2 		- 503 - 6
Quick Drinking Screen: Heavy Drinking Episodes Per Month -0.06
-2 		- 503 - 6
% Young Adults With Daily Tobacco Use 0.05
2 		- 503 - 6
% Young Adults With Weekly Cannabis Use 0.00
0 		- 503 - 6
Study 10450 - MI vs. No Intervention (Gentilello, 1999)
Change in Weekly Alcohol Consumption 3.07 *
49 		- 409 - 11
Study 10458 - Brief Motivational Intervention vs. Informational Leaflet Control Group (Hansen, 2012 - Not conducted in a usual care or practice setting)
Self Reported Drinks Per Week -0.08
-3 		- 670 - 6
Self Reported Drinks Per Week -0.13
-5 		- 616 - 12
Study 10398 - Motivational Brief Intervention vs. Assessment Only (Marlatt, 1998)
Q-F-P scales: Quantity of Alcohol Consumption, Past 30 Days 0.27 *
10 		- 299 - 3
Q-F-P scales: Frequency of Alcohol Consumption, Past 30 Days 0.22
8 		- 299 - 3
Q-F-P scales: Most Recent Peak Quantity of Alcohol Consumption 0.27 *
10 		- 299 - 3
Daily Drinking Questionnaire: Average Quantity Per Drinking Day 0.33 *
12 		- 299 - 3
Daily Drinking Questionnaire: Drinking Days Per Week 0.23
9 		- 299 - 3
Q-F-P scales: Quantity of Alcohol Consumption, Past 30 Days 0.28 *
11 		- 299 - 9
Q-F-P scales: Frequency of Alcohol Consumption, Past 30 Days 0.30 *
11 		- 299 - 9
Q-F-P scales: Most Recent Peak Quantity of Alcohol Consumption 0.28 *
10 		- 299 - 9
Daily Drinking Questionnarie: Average Quantity Per Drinking Day 0.27 *
10 		- 299 - 9
Daily Drinking Questionnaire: Drinking Days Per Week 0.16
6 		- 299 - 9
Q-F-P scales: Quantity of Alcohol Consumption, Past 30 Days 0.28 *
11 		- 299 - 21
Q-F-P scales: Frequency of Alcohol Consumption, Past 30 Days 0.21
8 		- 299 - 21
Q-F-P scales: Most Recent Peak Quantity of Alcohol Consumption 0.27 *
10 		- 299 - 21
Daily Drinking Questionnarie: Average Quantity Per Drinking Day 0.35 *
13 		- 299 - 21
Daily Drinking Questionnaire: Drinking Days Per Week 0.08
3 		- 299 - 21
Alcohol Dependence Scale 0.13
5 		- 299 - 9
Alcohol Dependence Scale 0.24 *
9 		- 299 - 9
Study 10503 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Informational Pamphlet (Rendall‐Mkosi, 2013)
Any Risky Drinking in Past 3 Months -0.21
-8 		- 125 - 12
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): Change in Median Score Favorable *
not calculated 		- 125 - 12
Study 10302 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Enhanced Care as Usual (Roy-Byrne, 2014)
Drug Use Days in Past 30 Days For Most Frequently Used Drug -0.08
-3 		- 767 - 3
Drug Use Days in Past 30 Days For Most Frequently Used Drug Null
not calculated 		- 766 - 6
Drug Use Days in Past 30 Days For Most Frequently Used Drug Null
not calculated 		- 761 - 9
Drug Use Days in Past 30 Days For Most Frequently Used Drug -0.11
-4 		- 778 - 12
Addiction Severity Index: Drug Use Composite Score -0.09
-3 		- 749 - 3
Addiction Severity Index: Drug Use Composite Score Null
not calculated 		- 747 - 6
Addiction Severity Index: Drug Use Composite Score Null
not calculated 		- 747 - 9
Addiction Severity Index: Drug Use Composite Score -0.05
-1 		- 762 - 12
Study 10511 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Business as Usual (Saitz, 2007)
Decrease in Drinks Per Day In Past 30 Days -0.09
-3 		- 287 - 12
Decrease in Heavy Drinking Episodes in Past 30 Days -0.04
-1 		- 287 - 12
Days Abstinent From Alcohol Consumption In Past 30 Days -0.14
-5 		- 287 - 12
% With Risky Drinking Amounts -0.06
-2 		- 287 - 12
% With Any Heavy Drinking Episodes in Past 30 Days -0.11
-4 		- 287 - 12
% Abstinent From Drinking In Past 30 Days -0.07
-2 		- 287 - 12
Study 10277 - Motivational Interviewing (MOTIV) vs. TAU (Saitz, 2014)
Days Using Main Drug in Past 30 Days -0.07
-2 		- 348 - 5
Days Using Main Drug More Than One Time in Past 30 Days -0.19
-7 		- 348 - 5
Days Using Main Drug More Than One Time in Past 90 Days Null
not calculated 		- 348 - 5
Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): Main Drug Score -0.07
-2 		- 348 - 5
Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): Cocaine Score 0.05
2 		- 348 - 5
Any Drug Use In Past 3 Months 0.30
11 		- 348 - 5
Any Risky Alcohol or Drug Use In Past 3 Months 0.25
9 		- 348 - 5
Any Marijuana Use In Past 3 Months 0.10
3 		- 348 - 5
Any Opioid Use In Past 3 Months 0.32
12 		- 348 - 5
Any Cocaine use In Past 3 Months 0.15
5 		- 348 - 5
Any Sedative Use In Past 3 Months -0.05
-2 		- 348 - 5
Days Using Main Drug in Past 30 Days Null
not calculated 		- 353 - 0
Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): Global Score -0.05
-2 		- 348 - 5
Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): Opioid Score -0.31 *
-12 		- 348 - 5
Any Injection Drug Use In Past 3 Months 0.46
17 		- 348 - 5
Any Use of More Than 1 Drug In Past 90 Days 0.16
6 		- 348 - 5
Any Prescription Drug Misuse in Past 90 Days 0.23
9 		- 348 - 5
Any Heavy Drinking in Past 30 Days -0.15
-5 		- 348 - 5
Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): % With Drug Dependence -0.28
-10 		- 348 - 5
Number of Heavy Drinking Days In Past Month -0.09
-3 		- 348 - 5
Days Using Main Drug More Than One Time in Past 30 Days Null
not calculated 		- 353 - 0
Any Amphetamine Use In Past 3 Months 0.17
6 		- 348 - 5
Any Hallucinogen Use In Past 3 Months 0.52
20 		- 348 - 5
Any Inhalant Use In Past 3 Months 0.52
20 		- 348 - 5
Study 10317 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Assessment Only (Stein, 2011)
Marijuana Use 0.38 *
14 		- 332 - 2
Marijuana Use 0.18
7 		- 332 - 5
Marijuana Use Severity 0.09
3 		- 332 - 2
Marijuana Use Severity 0.02
0 		- 332 - 5
Adult well-being: Parent/caregiver criminal behavior -0.01
0 		2 (7) 1610 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 7
Unfavorable: 0
 -
Study 10450 - MI vs. No Intervention (Gentilello, 1999)
Any Traffic Violation in Past 6 Months 0.12
4 		- 762 - 11
Any Moving Traffic Violation in Past 6 Months 0.10
4 		- 762 - 11
Any Driving Under the Influence Violation in Past 6 Months 0.16
6 		- 762 - 11
Any Arrest in Past 6 Months 0.35
13 		- 762 - 11
Any Alcohol-related Arrest in Past 6 Months 0.42
16 		- 762 - 11
Study 10302 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Enhanced Care as Usual (Roy-Byrne, 2014)
Addiction Severity Index: Legal Composite Score 0.00
0 		- 748 - 12
Felony or Gross Misdemeanor Arrests -0.12
-4 		- 848 - 12
Adult well-being: Family functioning 0.10
4 		1 (1) 777 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 1
Unfavorable: 0
 -
Study 10302 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Enhanced Care as Usual (Roy-Byrne, 2014)
Addiction Severity Index: Family/Social Composite Score 0.10
4 		- 777 - 12
Adult well-being: Parent/caregiver physical health 0.00
0 		4 (10) 2158 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 10
Unfavorable: 0
 -
Study 10450 - MI vs. No Intervention (Gentilello, 1999)
Injury-related Inpatient Hospitalization Null
not calculated 		- 762 - 35
Death Rate -0.25
-9 		- 409 - 11
Study 10302 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Enhanced Care as Usual (Roy-Byrne, 2014)
Addiction Severity Index: Medical Composite Score 0.01
0 		- 777 - 12
HIV Risk-taking Behavior Scale: One or More Risk Factors 0.06
2 		- 777 - 12
Mortality -0.21
-8 		- 848 - 12
Study 10277 - Motivational Interviewing (MOTIV) vs. TAU (Saitz, 2014)
Any Unsafe Sex In Past 3 Months 0.34
13 		- 348 - 5
Number of Unsafe Sex Encounters In Past 3 Months -0.02
0 		- 348 - 5
Any Unsafe Sex With Nonprimary or Transactional Partners In Past 3 Months 0.19
7 		- 348 - 5
Any Unsafe Sex with Transactional Partners In Past 3 Months 0.27
10 		- 348 - 5
Study 10318 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Assessment Only (Stein, 2009 - Not conducted in a usual care or practice setting)
Hepatitis C Virus Infection 0.11
4 		- 200 - 18
Adult well-being: Economic and housing stability -0.02
0 		1 (1) 777 Favorable: 0
No Effect: 1
Unfavorable: 0
 -
Study 10302 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Enhanced Care as Usual (Roy-Byrne, 2014)
Addiction Severity Index: Employment Composite Score -0.02
0 		- 777 - 12

*p <.05

Note: For the effect sizes and implied percentile effects reported in the table, a positive number favors the intervention group and a negative number favors the comparison group. Effect sizes and implied percentile effects were calculated by the Prevention Services Clearinghouse as described in the Handbook of Standards and Procedures, Section 5.10.4 and may not align with effect sizes reported in individual publications. Effect sizes for some outcomes were not able to be calculated by the Prevention Services Clearinghouse.

The findings reported for this program or service are derived from eligible, prioritized studies rated as moderate or high on study design and execution and do not represent the findings from all eligible studies of the program or service. Learn more on the FAQ page.

Only publications with eligible contrasts that met design and execution standards are included in the individual study findings table.

Full citations for the studies shown in the table are available in the "Studies Reviewed" section.

The participant characteristics display is an initial version. We encourage those interested in providing feedback to send suggestions to preventionservices@abtglobal.com.


The table below displays locations, the year, and participant demographics for studies that received moderate or high ratings on design and execution and that reported the information. Participant characteristics for studies with more than one intervention versus comparison group pair that received moderate or high ratings are shown separately in the table. Please note, the information presented here uses terminology directly from the study documents, when available. Studies that received moderate or high ratings on design and execution that did not include relevant participant demographic information would not be represented in this table.


For more information on how Clearinghouse reviewers record the information in the table, please see our Resource Guide on Study Participant Characteristics and Settings.

Characteristics of the Participants in the Studies with Moderate or High Ratings
Study Location Study Location more info Study Year Study Year more info Age or Grade-level Age or Grade-level more info Race, Ethnicity, Nationality Race, Ethnicity, Nationality more info Gender Gender more info Populations of Interest* Populations of Interest more info Household Socioeconomic Status Household Socioeconomic Status more info
Study 10272 - Brief MI (CHAT) vs. Enhanced Usual Care
Characteristics of the Children and Youth
Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Los Angeles, CA, USA 2013 Average age: 16 years; Age range 12-18 years 66% Hispanic
17% Black
12% White
5% Other/Multiracial 		57% Female -- --
Study 10427 - Brief Motivational Intervention (No Booster) vs. Enhanced Usual Care
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Ann Arbor, MI, USA 2010 Average age: 18.6 years; Age range: 14-20 years 79% White
11% Other races
10% African-American
6% Hispanic 		52% Male -- --
Study 10427 - Brief Motivational Intervention (No Booster) vs. Enhanced Usual Care
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Ann Arbor, MI, USA 2010 Average age: 18.6 years; Age range: 14-20 years 79% White
11% Other races
10% African-American
6% Hispanic 		52% Male -- --
Study 10397 - Brief Motivational Intervention vs. TAU
Characteristics of the Children and Youth
Hamburg, Germany 2011 Average Age: 15.8 9% Not born in Germany 51% Male sex -- --
Study 10406 - Motivational Intervention vs. Standard Assessed Control
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Boston, MA, USA 2004 Age range 14-21 years; 13% age 14-17 years, 87% age 18-21 years 52% Black ⁄ African American
26% White
19% Hispanic ⁄ Latino
1.6% American Indian ⁄ Alaskan Native
1.4% Asian
0.5% Native Hawaiian ⁄ Pacific Islander 		55% Female
45% Male 		-- --
Study 10497 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Treatment as Usual
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Västernorrland County, Sweden 2012 Average Age: 18 years 4% Foreign background 100% Female 56% Violence victimisation;
30% Risk consumption of alcohol defined as a score of 5 of more on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption 		--
Study 10302 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Enhanced Care as Usual
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
King County, WA, USA 2009 Average age: 47.76 45% White
37% Black
18% Other
9% Hispanic 		30% Women 64% Disabled and unable to work; 56% one or more mental illness ICD-9 diagnosis code;
30% Homeless in shelter or on street ≥1 night in past 90 days 		9% Working
27% Unemployed/retired/in school/homemaker/other
64% Disabled and unable to work
Study 10446 - Intervention Liaison-Delivered Motivational Interviewing vs. Treatment as Usual
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Western Pomerania, Germany 2002 Average age: 41.6 years; Age range 18-64 years -- 94% Male -- 42% Employed full/halftime
33% Job-seeking
21% Others (retired, students, housewives)
Study 10277 - Motivational Interviewing (MOTIV) vs. TAU
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Boston, MA, USA 2009 Average age: 42.0 68% Black
21% White
9% Hispanic
0.9% Other 		69% Male sex 48% diagnosed mood disorders --
Study 10317 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Assessment Only
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Providence, RI, USA 2005 Average age: 20.5; Age range: 18-24 years 68% Caucasian
11% Hispanic
11% African-American
10% Other 		-- -- --
Study 10442 - Brief Motivational Intervention vs. Brief Advice
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Dallas, TX, USA; Austin, TX, USA 2007 Average age: 34.8 years 42% Non-Hispanic White
28% Hispanic
26% Non-Hispanic Black
4% Other race/ethnicity 		75% Male
25% Female 		-- 67% Income ≥ 100% Federal Poverty Line
33% Income < 100% Federal Poverty Line
Study 10441 - Brief Motivational Interviewing vs. Treatment as Usual
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Houston, TX, USA 2003 Average age: 33 years; 30% age 18-24, 29% age 25-34, 23% age 35-44, 18% age 45+ 46% White
34% Hispanic
20% Black 		82% Male -- 15% Income level (US$) > 50,000
18% Income level (US$) 30,000 to ≤ 50,000
42% Income level (US$) 10,000 to ≤ 30,000
19% Income level (US$) ≤ 10,000
6% Income Level (US$) - No income
69% Employed
Study 10511 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Business as Usual
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
-- -- Mean age: 45 years 45% Black
39% White
9% Hispanic 		29% Women 77% DSM-IV alcohol dependence diagnosis during the past year; 4.4% DSM-IV alcohol abuse diagnosis during the past year;
70.1% Any lifetime interpersonal violence (e.g., physical or sexual);
25.2% Homeless at least 1 night during the past 3 months 		63% Unemployed during the past three months
Study 10448 - Brief Motivational Intervention vs. Waitlist Comparison Group
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Lausanne, Switzerland 2007 Average age 19.9 years -- 100% Male -- 19% Employed
78% In training
3% Inactive
Study 10458 - Brief Motivational Intervention vs. Informational Leaflet Control Group
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Denmark 2008 Mean Age: 58 years; Age range: 48-65 years -- 51% Men
49% Women 		100% Persons with weekly alcohol consumption above the maximum recommended by the Danish National Board of Health; 57% reported drinking five or more drinks per occasion at least once a week. 50% Employed
Study 10439 - Therapist-Delivered Brief Intervention vs. Enhanced Usual Care
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Ann Arbor, MI, USA 2012 Average age: 34.5 years; Age range: 21-65 years 94% Non-Hispanic
79% White
14% Black
7% Other
6% Hispanic 		60% Female
40% Male 		-- 41% Household income $40,000 or more
17% Household income $20,000-$39,999
14% $10,000-$19,999
15% Household income less than $10,000
63% Employed
37% Unemployed
Study 10398 - Motivational Brief Intervention vs. Assessment Only
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Seattle, WA, USA 1990 100% First term in college, not over 19 years of age 84% Caucasian 54% Women
46% Men 		-- --
Study 10435 - Brief Motivational Intervention vs. Self-assessment
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Rennes, France 2010 Average Age: 20.2 years; Age range: 16-24 years -- 72% Men
28% Women 		-- --
Study 10450 - MI vs. No Intervention
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Seattle, Washington, USA 1994 Average age: 36 years -- 82% Male 56% score of 3-8 on the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST); 17% score of 9-13 on the SMAST 50% Employed
Study 10480 - Basic BMI vs. No Treatment Control
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Northeast, United States 2001 Mean Age: 19 years; 53% College freshmen 89% White 66% Women
34% Men 		100% Reported one or more episode of heavy drinking in an average week or four heavy drinking episodes in the last month, defined as four or more standard drinks for women and five or more standard drinks for men --
Study 10503 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Informational Pamphlet
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Bergrivier Municipality, Western Cape, South Africa 2007 Average age: 30 years; Age range: 18-44 years 99% Mixed race ancestry 100% Women 100% Non-pregnant women at risk for alcohol exposed pregnancy due to living in a rural area with a high prevalence of alcohol use and low prevalence of contraceptive use;
48% Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score of 20 or more, indicating possible alcohol dependence 		--
Study 10318 - Motivational Interviewing vs. Assessment Only
Characteristics of the Adults, Parents, or Caregivers
Providence, RI, USA 2001 Average age: 37.2 46% Caucasian 63% Male -- --

“--” indicates information not reported in the study.


* The information about disabilities is based on initial coding. For more information on how the Clearinghouse recorded disability information for the initial release, please see our Resource Guide on Study Participant Characteristics and Settings. The Clearinghouse is currently seeking consultation from experts, including those with lived experience, and input from the public to enhance and improve the display.


Note: Citations for the documents associated with each 5-digit study number shown in the table can be found in the “Studies Reviewed” section below. Study settings and participant demographics are recorded for all studies that received moderate or high ratings on design and execution and that reported the information. Studies that did not report any information about setting or participant demographics are not displayed. For more information on how participant characteristics are recorded, please see our Resource Guide on Study Participant Characteristics and Settings.

Sometimes study results are reported in more than one document, or a single document reports results from multiple studies. Studies are identified below by their Prevention Services Clearinghouse study identification numbers. To receive a rating of supported or well-supported, the favorable evidence for a program or service must have been obtained from research conducted in a usual care or practice setting.

Studies Rated High

Study 10272

D'Amico, E. J., Parast, L., Shadel, W. G., Meredith, L. S., Seelam, R., & Stein, B. D. (2018). Brief motivational interviewing intervention to reduce alcohol and marijuana use for at-risk adolescents in primary care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(9), 775-786. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000332

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10302

Roy-Byrne, P., Bumgardner, K., Krupski, A., Dunn, C., Ries, R., Donovan, D., . . . Zarkin, G. A. (2014). Brief intervention for problem drug use in safety-net primary care settings: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 312(5), 492-501. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.7860

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10317

Stein, M. D., Hagerty, C. E., Herman, D. S., Phipps, M. G., & Anderson, B. J. (2011). A brief marijuana intervention for non-treatment-seeking young adult women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 40(2), 189-198. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2010.11.001

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10442

Field, C., Walters, S., Marti, C. N., Jun, J., Foreman, M., & Brown, C. (2014). A multisite randomized controlled trial of brief intervention to reduce drinking in the trauma care setting: How brief is brief? Annals Of Surgery, 259(5), 873-880. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000339

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10511

Saitz, R., Palfai, T. P., Cheng, D. M., Horton, N. J., Freedner, N., Dukes, K., . . . Samet, J. H. (2007). Brief intervention for medical inpatients with unhealthy alcohol use: A randomized, controlled trial. Annals Of Internal Medicine, 146(3), 167-176. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-3-200702060-00005

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10448

Gaume, J., Gmel, G., Faouzi, M., Bertholet, N., & Daeppen, J. B. (2011). Is brief motivational intervention effective in reducing alcohol use among young men voluntarily receiving it? A randomized controlled trial. Alcoholism, 35(10), 1822-1830. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01526.x

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10458

Hansen, A. B. G., Becker, U., Nielsen, A. S., Grønbæk, M., & Tolstrup, J. S. (2012). Brief alcohol intervention by newly trained workers versus leaflets: Comparison of effect in older heavy drinkers identified in a population health examination survey: A randomized controlled trial. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 47(1), 25-32. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agr140

This study was not conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10427

Cunningham, R. M., Chermack, S. T., Ehrlich, P. F., Carter, P. M., Booth, B. M., Blow, F. C., . . . Walton, M. A. (2015). Alcohol interventions among underage drinkers in the ED: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 136(4), e783-e793. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-1260

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10277

Fuster, D., Cheng, D. M., Wang, N., Bernstein, J. A., Palfai, T. P., Alford, D. P., . . . Saitz, R. (2016). Brief intervention for daily marijuana users identified by screening in primary care: A subgroup analysis of the aspire randomized clinical trial. Substance Abuse, 37(2), 336-342. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2015.1075932

Saitz, R., Palfai, T. P. A., Cheng, D. M., Alford, D. P., Bernstein, J. A., Lloyd-Travaglini, C. A., . . . Samet, J. H. (2014). Screening and brief intervention for drug use in primary care: The aspire randomized clinical trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 312(5), 502-513. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.7862

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10397

Arnaud, N., Diestelkamp, S., Wartberg, L., Sack, P.-M., Daubmann, A., & Thomasius, R. (2017). Short- to midterm effectiveness of a brief motivational intervention to reduce alcohol use and related problems for alcohol intoxicated children and adolescents in pediatric emergency departments: A randomized controlled trial. Academic Emergency Medicine, 24(2), 186-200. doi:10.1111/acem.13126

Diestelkamp, S., Arnaud, N., Sack, P.-M., Wartberg, L., Daubmann, A., & Thomasius, R. (2014). Brief motivational intervention for adolescents treated in emergency departments for acute alcohol intoxication - a randomized-controlled trial. BMC Emergency Medicine, 14, 13. doi:10.1186/1471-227X-14-13

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10406

Bernstein, J., Heeren, T., Edward, E., Dorfman, D., Bliss, C., Winter, M., & Bernstein, E. (2010). A brief motivational interview in a pediatric emergency department, plus 10-day telephone follow-up, increases attempts to quit drinking among youth and young adults who screen positive for problematic drinking. Academic Emergency Medicine, 17(8), 890-902. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00818.x

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10450

Gentilello, L. M., Rivara, F. P., Donovan, D. M., Jurkovich, G. J., Daranciang, E., Dunn, C. W., . . . Ries, R. R. (1999). Alcohol interventions in a trauma center as a means of reducing the risk of injury recurrence. Annals Of Surgery, 230(4), 473-480.

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10480

Carey, K. B., Carey, M. P., Maisto, S. A., & Henson, J. M. (2006). Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized control trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 943-954. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.943

Merrill, J. E., Reid, A. E., Carey, M. P., & Carey, K. B. (2014). Gender and depression moderate response to brief motivational intervention for alcohol misuse among college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(6), 984-992. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037039

This study was not conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)

Studies Rated Moderate

Study 10318

Stein, M. D., Herman, D. S., & Anderson, B. J. (2009). A motivational intervention trial to reduce cocaine use. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36(1), 118-125. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2008.05.003

This study was not conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10441

Field, C., & Caetano, R. (2010). The role of ethnic matching between patient and provider on the effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions with hispanics. Alcoholism, 34(2), 262-271. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01089.x

Field, C. A., & Caetano, R. (2010). The effectiveness of brief intervention among injured patients with alcohol dependence: Who benefits from brief interventions? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 111(1-2), 13-20. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.11.025

Field, C. A., Caetano, R., Harris, T. R., Frankowski, R., & Roudsari, B. (2010). Ethnic differences in drinking outcomes following a brief alcohol intervention in the trauma care setting. Addiction, 105(1), 62-73. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02737.x

Roudsari, B., Caetano, R., Frankowski, R., & Field, C. (2009). Do minority or white patients respond to brief alcohol interventions in trauma centers? A randomized trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 54(2), 285-293. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.01.033.

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10446

Freyer-Adam, J., Coder, B., Baumeister, S. E., Bischof, G., Riedel, J., Paatsch, K., . . . Hapke, U. (2008). Brief alcohol intervention for general hospital inpatients: A randomized controlled trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 93(3), 233-243. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.09.016

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10439

Fernandez, A. C., Waller, R., Walton, M. A., Bonar, E. E., Ignacio, R. V., Chermack, S. T., . . . Blow, F. C. (2019). Alcohol use severity and age moderate the effects of brief interventions in an emergency department randomized controlled trial. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 194, 386-394. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.10.021

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10398

Marlatt, G. A., Baer, J. S., Kivlahan, D. R., Dimeff, L. A., Larimer, M. E., Quigley, L. A., . . . Williams, E. (1998). Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: Results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(4), 604-615. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.4.604

Baer, J. S., Kivlahan, D. R., Blume, A. W., McKnight, P., & Marlatt, G. A. (2001). Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history. American Journal of Public Health, 91(8), 1310-1316. doi:10.2105/ajph.91.8.1310

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10435

Diaz Gomez, C., Ngantcha, M., Le Garjean, N., Brouard, N., Lasbleiz, M., Perennes, M., . . . Bellou, A. (2019). Effect of a brief motivational intervention in reducing alcohol consumption in the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal Of Emergency Medicine, 26(1), 59-64. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000488

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10497

Palm, A., Olofsson, N., Danielsson, I., Skalkidou, A., Wennberg, P., & Högberg, U. (2016). Motivational interviewing does not affect risk drinking among young women: A randomised, controlled intervention study in Swedish youth health centres. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 44(6), 611-618. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494816654047

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)
Study 10503

Rendall‐Mkosi, K., Morojele, N., London, L., Moodley, S., Singh, C., & Girdler‐Brown, B. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing to prevent risk for an alcohol‐exposed pregnancy in the Western Cape, South Africa. Addiction, 108(4), 725-732. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.12081

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)

Studies Rated Low

Study 10290

McCambridge, J., Hunt, C., Jenkins, R. J., & Strang, J. (2011). Cluster randomised trial of the effectiveness of motivational interviewing for universal prevention. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 114(2-3), 177-184.

This study received a low rating because it did not meet the statistical model standards.
Study 10292

McCambridge, J., & Strang, J. (2004). The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: Results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial. Addiction, 99(1), 39-52. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00564.x

McCambridge, J., & Strang, J. (2005). Deterioration over time in effect of motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and related risk among young people. Addiction, 100(4), 470-478. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01013.x

This study received a low rating because it did not meet design confound standards.
Study 10309

Shetty, V., Murphy, D. A., Zigler, C., Yamashita, D. D., Belin, T. R., Shetty, V., . . . Belin, T. R. (2011). Randomized controlled trial of personalized motivational interventions in substance using patients with facial injuries. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (02782391), 69(9), 2396-2411. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.040

This study received a low rating because baseline equivalence of the intervention and comparison groups was necessary and not demonstrated.
Study 10299

Otto, C., Crackau, B., Löhrmann, I., Zahradnik, A., Bischof, G., John, U., & Rumpf, H.-J. (2009). Brief intervention in general hospital for problematic prescription drug use: 12-month outcome. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 105(3), 221-226. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.010

Zahradnik, A., Otto, C., Crackau, B., Löhrmann, I., Bischof, G., John, U., & Rumpf, H.-J. (2009). Randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention for problematic prescription drug use in non-treatment-seeking patients. Addiction, 104(1), 109-117. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02421.x

This study received a low rating because baseline equivalence of the intervention and comparison groups was necessary and not demonstrated.
Study 10461

Ingersoll, K. S., Ceperich, S. D., Hettema, J. E., Farrell-Carnahan, L., & Penberthy, J. K. (2013). Preconceptional motivational interviewing interventions to reduce alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44(4), 407-416. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2012.10.001

Penberthy, J. K., Hook, J. N., Hettema, J., Farrell-Carnahan, L., & Ingersoll, K. (2013). Depressive symptoms moderate treatment response to brief intervention for prevention of alcohol exposed pregnancy. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 45(4), 335-342. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2013.05.002

This study received a low rating because baseline equivalence of the intervention and comparison groups was necessary and not demonstrated.
Study 10516

Senft, R. A., Polen, M. R., Freeborn, D. K., & Hollis, J. F. (1997). Brief intervention in a primary care setting for hazardous drinkers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 13(6), 464-470.

This study received a low rating because baseline equivalence of the intervention and comparison groups was necessary and not demonstrated.
Study 10542

Zatzick, D., Donovan, D. M., Jurkovich, G., Gentilello, L., Dunn, C., Russo, J., . . . Rivara, F. P. (2014). Disseminating alcohol screening and brief intervention at trauma centers: A policy‐relevant cluster randomized effectiveness trial. Addiction, 109(5), 754-765. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.12492

This study received a low rating because the standards for addressing missing data were not met.
Study 10533

Wagener, T. L., Leffingwell, T. R., Mignogna, J., Mignogna, M. R., Weaver, C. C., Cooney, N. J., & Claborn, K. R. (2012). Randomized trial comparing computer-delivered and face-to-face personalized feedback interventions for high-risk drinking among college students. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 43(2), 260-267. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2011.11.001

Study 10449

Gaume, J., Magill, M., Longabaugh, R., Bertholet, N., Gmel, G., & Daeppen, J. B. (2014). Influence of counselor characteristics and behaviors on the efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for heavy drinking in young men—a randomized controlled trial. Alcoholism, 38(7), 2138-2147. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.12469

This study received a low rating because it did not meet design confound standards.

Studies Reviewed for Risk of Harm

Study 10319

Stein, M. D., Herman, D. S., & Anderson, B. J. (2009). A trial to reduce Hepatitis C seroincidence in drug users. Journal Of Addictive Diseases, 28(4), 389-398. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10550880903183034

Study 10422

Ceperich, S. D., & Ingersoll, K. S. (2011). Motivational interviewing + feedback intervention to reduce alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk among college binge drinkers: Determinants and patterns of response. Journal Of Behavioral Medicine, 34(5), 381-395. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-010-9308-2

Study 10401

Baker, A., Kochan, N., Dixon, J., Heather, N., & Wodak, A. (1994). Controlled evaluation of a brief intervention for HIV prevention among injecting drug users not in treatment. AIDS Care, 6(5), 559-570.

Study 10420

Carey, K. B., Carey, M. P., Henson, J. M., Maisto, S. A., & DeMartini, K. S. (2011). Brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students: Comparison of face‐to‐face counseling and computer‐delivered interventions. Addiction, 106(3), 528-537. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03193.x

Study 10457

Handmaker, N. S., Miller, W. R., & Manicke, M. (1999). Findings of a pilot study of motivational interviewing with pregnant drinkers. Journal Of Studies On Alcohol, 60(2), 285-287.

Study 10459

Hasin, D. S., Aharonovich, E., O'Leary, A., Greenstein, E., Pavlicova, M., Arunajadai, S., . . . Johnston, B. (2013). Reducing heavy drinking in HIV primary care: A randomized trial of brief intervention, with and without technological enhancement. Addiction, 108(7), 1230-1240. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.12127

Elliott, J. C., Delker, E., Wall, M. M., Feng, T., Aharonovich, E., Tracy, M., . . . Hasin, D. S. (2016). Neighborhood‐level drinking norms and alcohol intervention outcomes in HIV patients who are heavy drinkers. Alcoholism, 40(10), 2240-2246. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.13198

Study 10464

Kahler, C. W., Pantalone, D. W., Mastroleo, N. R., Liu, T., Bove, G., Ramratnam, B., . . . Mayer, K. H. (2018). Motivational interviewing with personalized feedback to reduce alcohol use in HIV-infected men who have sex with men: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(8), 645-656. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000322

Study 10400

Bager, P., & Vilstrup, H. (2010). Post-discharge brief intervention increases the frequency of alcohol abstinence—a randomized trial. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 21(1), 37-41. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10884601003628104

Study 10407

Blow, F. C., Walton, M. A., Bohnert, A. S. B., Ignacio, R. V., Chermack, S., Cunningham, R. M., . . . Barry, K. L. (2017). A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions to reduce drug use among adults in a low-income urban emergency department: The Healthier You study. Addiction, 112(8), 1395-1405. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.13773

Study 10423

Clinton-Sherrod, M., Morgan-Lopez, A. A., Brown, J. M., McMillen, B. A., & Cowells, A. (2011). Incapacitated sexual violence involving alcohol among college women: The impact of a brief drinking intervention. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 135-154. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801210394272

Study 10438

Feldstein, S. W., & Forcehimes, A. A. (2007). Motivational interviewing with underage college drinkers: A preliminary look at the role of empathy and alliance. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 33(5), 737-746. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00952990701522690

Study 10414

Brown, T. G., Dongier, M., Ouimet, M. C., Tremblay, J., Chanut, F., Legault, L., & Ng Ying Kin, N. M. (2010). Brief motivational interviewing for DWI recidivists who abuse alcohol and are not participating in DWI intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Alcoholism, 34(2), 292-301. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01092.x

Ouimet, M. C., Dongier, M., Di Leo, I., Legault, L., Tremblay, J., Chanut, F., & Brown, T. G. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of brief motivational interviewing in impaired driving recidivists: A 5‐year follow‐up of traffic offenses and crashes. Alcoholism, 37(11), 1979-1985. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.12180

Study 10418

Wood, M. D., Capone, C., Laforge, R., Erickson, D. J., & Brand, N. H. (2007). Brief motivational intervention and alcohol expectancy challenge with heavy drinking college students: A randomized factorial study. Addictive Behaviors, 32(11), 2509-2528. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.018

Capone, C., & Wood, M. D. (2009). Thinking about drinking: Need for cognition and readiness to change moderate the effects of brief alcohol interventions. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(4), 684-688. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016235

Study 10430

Dauer, A. R.-M., Rubio, E. S., Coris, M. E., & Valls, J. M. (2006). Brief intervention in alcohol-positive traffic casualties: Is it worth the effort? Alcohol and Alcoholism, 41(1), 76-83. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agh241

Study 10404

Beckham, N. (2007). Motivational interviewing with hazardous drinkers. Journal Of The American Academy Of Nurse Practitioners, 19(2), 103-110.

Study 10460

Heather, N., Rollnick, S., Bell, A., & Richmond, R. (1996). Effects of brief counselling among male heavy drinkers identified on general hospital wards. Drug and Alcohol Review, 15(1), 29-38.

Study 10462

Ingersoll, K. S., Ceperich, S. D., Nettleman, M. D., Karanda, K., Brocksen, S., & Johnson, B. A. (2005). Reducing alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk in college women: Initial outcomes of a clinical trial of a motivational intervention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 29(3), 173-180. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2005.06.003

Study 10468

Kuchipudi, V., Hobein, K., Flickinger, A., & Iber, F. L. (1990). Failure of a 2-hour motivational intervention to alter recurrent drinking behavior in alcoholics with gastrointestinal disease. Journal Of Studies On Alcohol, 51(4), 356-360.

Study 10493

Ostafin, B. D., & Palfai, T. P. (2012). When wanting to change is not enough: Automatic appetitive processes moderate the effects of a brief alcohol intervention in hazardous-drinking college students. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 7, 25-25. doi:10.1186/1940-0640-7-25

Study 10494

Osterman, R. L., Carle, A. C., Ammerman, R. T., & Gates, D. (2014). Single-session motivational intervention to decrease alcohol use during pregnancy. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 47(1), 10-19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2014.01.009

Study 10495

Osterman, R. L., & Dyehouse, J. (2012). Effects of a motivational interviewing intervention to decrease prenatal alcohol use. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 34(4), 434-454. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193945911402523

Study 10545

Bradley, E. G. (2012). Reducing adolescent smoking through a school-based motivational intervention: A pilot study. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 8(1), 38-44. doi:10.7790/ejap.v8i1.319

Study 10546

Colby, S. M., Monti, P. M., Barnett, N. P., Rohsenow, D. J., Weissman, K., Spirito, A., ... & Lewander, W. J. (1998). Brief motivational interviewing in a hospital setting for adolescent smoking: A preliminary study. Journal Of Consulting And Clinical Psychology, 66(3), 574-578.

Study 10547

Colby, S. M., Monti, P. M., Tevyaw, T. O. L., Barnett, N. P., Spirito, A., Rohsenow, D. J., ... & Lewander, W. (2005). Brief motivational intervention for adolescent smokers in medical settings. Addictive Behaviors, 30(5), 865-874.

Study 10552

Kelly, A. B., & Lapworth, K. (2006). The HYP program--targeted motivational interviewing for adolescent violations of school tobacco policy. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 43(6), 466-471. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.06.018

Study 10482

Monti, P. M., Colby, S. M., Barnett, N. P., Spirito, A., Rohsenow, D. J., Myers, M., . . . Lewander, W. (1999). Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol-positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 989-994.

Tapert, S. F., Colby, S. M., Barnett, N. P., Spirito, A., Rohsenow, D. J., Myers, M. G., & Monti, P. M. (2003). Depressed mood, gender, and problem drinking in youth. Journal Of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 12(4), 55-68. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J029v12n04_04

Study 10483

Monti, P. M., Mastroleo, N. R., Barnett, N. P., Colby, S. M., Kahler, C. W., & Operario, D. (2016). Brief motivational intervention to reduce alcohol and HIV/sexual risk behavior in emergency department patients: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(7), 580-591. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000097

Study 10509

Rongkavilit, C., Naar-King, S., Wang, B., Panthong, A., Bunupuradah, T., Parsons, J. T., . . . Phanuphak, P. (2013). Motivational interviewing targeting risk behaviors for youth living with HIV in Thailand. AIDS and Behavior, 17(6), 2063-2074. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0407-2

Study 10514

Schermer, C. R., Moyers, T., Miller, W., & Bloomfield, L. (2006). Trauma center brief interventions for alcohol disorders decrease subsequent driving under the influence arrests. The Journal Of Trauma, 60(1), 29-34. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000199420.12322.5d

Study 10520

Spirito, A., Monti, P. M., Barnett, N. P., Colby, S. M., Sindelar, H., Rohsenow, D. J., . . . Myers, M. (2004). A randomized clinical trial of a brief motivational intervention for alcohol-positive adolescents treated in an emergency department. Journal of Pediatrics, 145(3), 396-402.

Study 10512

Sander, A. M., Bogner, J., Nick, T. G., Clark, A. N., Corrigan, J. D., & Rozzell, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of brief intervention for problem alcohol use in persons with traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 27(5), 319-330. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e318269838c

Study 10515

Segatto, M. L., Andreoni, S., de Souza e Silva, R., Diehl, A., & Pinsky, I. (2011). Brief motivational interview and educational brochure in emergency room settings for adolescents and young adults with alcohol-related problems: A randomized single-blind clinical trial. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 33(3), 225-233. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462011000300004

Study 10523

Stein, M. D., Charuvastra, A., Maksad, J., & Anderson, B. J. (2002). A randomized trial of a brief alcohol intervention for needle exchangers (BRAINE). Addiction, 97(6), 691-700. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00102.x

Stein, M. D., Anderson, B., Charuvastra, A., Maksad, J., & Friedmann, P. D. (2002). A brief intervention for hazardous drinkers in a needle exchange program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(1), 23-31. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00207-0

Study 10553

Lando, H. A., Hennrikus, D., Boyle, R., Lazovich, D., Stafne, E., & Rindal, B. (2007). Promoting tobacco abstinence among older adolescents in dental clinics. Journal of Smoking Cessation, 2(1), 23-30. doi:10.1375/jsc.2.1.23

Study 10252

Aharonovich, E., Sarvet, A., Stohl, M., DesJarlais, D., Tross, S., Hurst, T., . . . Hasin, D. (2017). Reducing non-injection drug use in HIV primary care: A randomized trial of brief motivational interviewing, with and without healthcall, a technology-based enhancement. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 74, 71-79. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2016.12.009

Study 10254

Baer, J. S., Garrett, S. B., Beadnell, B., Wells, E. A., & Peterson, P. L. (2007). Brief motivational intervention with homeless adolescents: Evaluating effects on substance use and service utilization. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(4), 582-586. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.21.4.582

Study 10260

Bernstein, J., Bernstein, E., Tassiopoulos, K., Heeren, T., Levenson, S., & Hingson, R. (2005). Brief motivational intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 77(1), 49-59. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.07.006

Study 10264

Bohnert, A. S. B., Bonar, E. E., Cunningham, R., Greenwald, M. K., Thomas, L., Chermack, S., . . . Walton, M. (2016). A pilot randomized clinical trial of an intervention to reduce overdose risk behaviors among emergency department patients at risk for prescription opioid overdose. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 163, 40-47. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.03.018

Study 10271

D'Amico, E. J., Miles, J. N. V., Stern, S. A., & Meredith, L. S. (2008). Brief motivational interviewing for teens at risk of substance use consequences: A randomized pilot study in a primary care clinic. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 35(1), 53-61. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2007.08.008

Study 10278

Gray, E., McCambridge, J., & Strang, J. (2005). The effectiveness of motivational interviewing delivered by youth workers in reducing drinking, cigarette and cannabis smoking among young people: Quasi-experimental pilot study. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 40(6), 535-539. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agh199

Study 10287

Marsden, J., Stillwell, G., Barlow, H., Boys, A., Taylor, C., Hunt, N., & Farrell, M. (2006). An evaluation of a brief motivational intervention among young ecstasy and cocaine users: No effect on substance and alcohol use outcomes. Addiction, 101(7), 1014-1026. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01290.x

Marsden, J., Stillwell, G., Barlow, H., Taylor, C., Boys, A., & Hunt, N. (2005). An evaluation of a brief intervention model for use with young non-injecting stimulant users. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 12(Suppl1), 90-93.

Study 10291

McCambridge, J., Slym, R. L., & Strang, J. (2008). Randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing compared with drug information and advice for early intervention among young cannabis users. Addiction, 103(11), 1809-1818. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02331.x

Study 10294

Mertens, J. R., Ward, C. L., Bresick, G. F., Broder, T., & Weisner, C. M. (2014). Effectiveness of nurse-practitioner-delivered brief motivational intervention for young adult alcohol and drug use in primary care in south africa: A randomized clinical trial. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 49(4), 430-438. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agu030

Ward, C. L., Mertens, J. R., Bresick, G. F., Little, F., & Weisner, C. M. (2015). Screening and brief intervention for substance misuse: Does it reduce aggression and hiv-related risk behaviours? Alcohol and Alcoholism, 50(3), 302-309. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agv007

Study 10320

Stephens, R. S., Roffman, R. A., & Curtin, L. (2000). Comparison of extended versus brief treatments for marijuana use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(5), 898-908. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.898

Study 10321

Stephens, R. S., Roffman, R. A., Fearer, S. A., Williams, C., & Burke, R. S. (2007). The marijuana check-up: Promoting change in ambivalent marijuana users. Addiction, 102(6), 947-957. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01821.x


Studies Not Eligible for Review

Study 10253

Aldemir, E., Berk, G., & Coşkunol, H. (2018). The effects of the addiction programme of probation on treatment motivation, abstinence and quality of life: A comparative study with motivational interviewing and individual intervention. Noro Psikiyatri Arsivi, 55(3), 261-270. doi:10.5152/npa.2017.19440

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10255

Bagøien, G., Bjørngaard, J. H., Østensen, C., Reitan, S. K., Romundstad, P., & Morken, G. (2013). The effects of motivational interviewing on patients with comorbid substance use admitted to a psychiatric emergency unit—a randomised controlled trial with two year follow-up. BMC Psychiatry, 13. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-93

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10256

Baker, A., Heather, N., Wodak, A., Dixon, J., & Holt, P. (1993). Evaluation of a cognitive-behavioural intervention for hiv prevention among injecting drug users. AIDS (London, England), 7(2), 247-256.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10257

Baker, A., Kochan, N., Dixon, J., Heather, N., & Wodak, A. (1994). Controlled evaluation of a brief intervention for hiv prevention among injecting drug users not in treatment. AIDS Care, 6(5), 559-570.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not report program or service impacts on an eligible target outcome (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.5).

Study 10258

Baker, A., Lewin, T., Reichler, H., Clancy, R., Carr, V., Garrett, R., . . . Terry, M. (2002). Evaluation of a motivational interview for substance use within psychiatric in-patient services. Addiction, 97(10), 1329-1337. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00178.x

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10259

Begun, A. L., Rose, S. J., & LeBel, T. P. (2011). Intervening with women in jail around alcohol and substance abuse during preparation for community reentry. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 29(4), 453-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2011.608333

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10261

Bertrand, K., Roy, É., Vaillancourt, É., Vandermeerschen, J., Berbiche, D., & Boivin, J. F. (2015). Randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing for reducing injection risk behaviours among people who inject drugs. Addiction, 110(5), 832-841. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.12867

This study is ineligible for review because it does not report program or service impacts on an eligible target outcome (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.5).

Study 10262

Blow, F. C., Walton, M. A., Bohnert, A. S. B., Ignacio, R. V., Chermack, S., Cunningham, R. M., . . . Barry, K. L. (2017). A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions to reduce drug use among adults in a low-income urban emergency department: The healthier you study. Addiction, 112(8), 1395-1405. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.13773

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10263

Bogenschutz, M. P., Donovan, D. M., Mandler, R. N., Perl, H. I., Forcehimes, A. A., Crandall, C., . . . Macias-Konstantopoulos, W. (2014). Brief intervention for patients with problematic drug use presenting in emergency departments: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(11), 1736-1745. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4052

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10265

Braciszewski, J. M., Tzilos Wernette, G. K., Moore, R. S., Bock, B. C., Stout, R. L., & Chamberlain, P. (2018). A pilot randomized controlled trial of a technology-based substance use intervention for youth exiting foster care. Children and Youth Services Review. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.08.011

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10266

Brown, R. A., Abrantes, A. M., Minami, H., Prince, M. A., Bloom, E. L., Apodaca, T. R., . . . Hunt, J. I. (2015). Motivational interviewing to reduce substance use in adolescents with psychiatric comorbidity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 59, 20-29. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2015.06.016

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10267

Carroll, K. M., Ball, S. A., Nich, C., Martino, S., Frankforter, T. L., Farentinos, C., . . . Woody, G. E. (2006). Motivational interviewing to improve treatment engagement and outcome in individuals seeking treatment for substance abuse: A multisite effectiveness study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 81(3), 301-312. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.08.002

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10268

Clair, M., Stein, L. A. R., Soenksen, S., Martin, R. A., Lebeau, R., & Golembeske, C. (2013). Ethnicity as a moderator of motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents after release. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 45(4), 370-375. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2013.05.006

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10269

Clair-Michaud, M., Martin, R. A., Stein, L. A. R., Bassett, S., Lebeau, R., & Golembeske, C. (2016). The impact of motivational interviewing on delinquent behaviors in incarcerated adolescents. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 65, 13-19. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2015.09.003

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10270

Coffin, P. O., Santos, G.-M., Matheson, T., Behar, E., Rowe, C., Rubin, T., . . . Vittinghoff, E. (2017). Behavioral intervention to reduce opioid overdose among high-risk persons with opioid use disorder: A pilot randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 12(10), e0183354-e0183354. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183354

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10273

Dennis, M., Scott, C. K., & Funk, R. (2003). An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (rmc) for people with chronic substance use disorders. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26(3), 339-352. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00037-5

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10274

Donovan, D. M., Rosengren, D. B., Downey, L., Cox, G. B., & Sloan, K. L. (2001). Attrition prevention with individuals awaiting publicly funded drug treatment. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 96(8), 1149-1160.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10275

Fernandes, S., Ferigolo, M., Benchaya, M. C., de Campos Moreira, T., Pierozan, P. S., Mazoni, C. G., & Barros, H. M. T. (2010). Brief motivational intervention and telemedicine: A new perspective of treatment to marijuana users. Addictive Behaviors, 35(8), 750-755. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.001

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10276

Forsberg, L. G., Ernst, D., Sundqvist, K., & Farbring, C. Å. (2011). Motivational interviewing delivered by existing prison staff: A randomized controlled study of effectiveness on substance use after release. Substance Use & Misuse, 46(12), 1477-1485. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2011.591880

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10279

Haddock, G., Barrowclough, C., Tarrier, N., Moring, J., O'Brien, R., Schofield, N., . . . Lewis, S. (2003). Cognitive-behavioural therapy and motivational intervention for schizophrenia and substance misuse: 18-month outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 183(5), 418-426. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.183.5.418

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10280

Hides, L., Carroll, S., Scott, R., Cotton, S., Baker, A., & Lubman, D. I. (2013). Quik fix: A randomized controlled trial of an enhanced brief motivational interviewing intervention for alcohol/cannabis and psychological distress in young people. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 82(2), 122-124. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000341921

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10281

Johnson, S. L., Jones, V., & Cheng, T. L. (2015). Promoting “healthy futures” to reduce risk behaviors in urban youth: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56(1-2), 36-45. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9734-y

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10282

Jungerman, F. S., Andreoni, S., & Laranjeira, R. (2007). Short term impact of same intensity but different duration interventions for cannabis users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90(2-3), 120-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.02.019

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10283

Klag, S., O'Callaghan, F., Creed, P., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. (2009). Motivating young people towards success: Evaluation of a motivational interviewing-integrated treatment programme for cod clients in a residential therapeutic community. Therapeutic Communities, 30(4), 366-386.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10284

Lerch, J., Walters, S. T., Tang, L., & Taxman, F. S. (2017). Effectiveness of a computerized motivational intervention on treatment initiation and substance use: Results from a randomized trial. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 80, 59-66. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.002

Taxman, F. S., Walters, S. T., Sloas, L. B., Lerch, J., & Rodriguez, M. (2015). Motivational tools to improve probationer treatment outcomes. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 43, 120-128. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.016

Cowell, A. J., Zarkin, G. A., Wedehase, B. J., Lerch, J., Walters, S. T., & Taxman, F. S. (2018). Cost and cost-effectiveness of computerized vs. in-person motivational interventions in the criminal justice system. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 87, 42-49. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2018.01.013

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10285

Li, L., Wu, Z., Liang, L.-J., Lin, C., Zhang, L., Guo, S., . . . Li, J. (2013). An intervention targeting service providers and clients for methadone maintenance treatment in china: A cluster-randomized trial. Addiction, 108(2), 356-366. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04020.x

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10286

Longshore, D., & Grills, C. (2000). Motivating illegal drug use recovery: Evidence for a culturally congruent intervention. Journal of Black Psychology, 26(3), 288-301. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095798400026003002

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10289

Martino, S., Carroll, K. M., Nich, C., & Rounsaville, B. J. (2006). A randomized controlled pilot study of motivational interviewing for patients with psychotic and drug use disorders. Addiction, 101(10), 1479-1492. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01554.x

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10295

Mullins, S. M., Suarez, M., Ondersma, S. J., & Page, M. C. (2004). The impact of motivational interviewing on substance abuse treatment retention: A randomized control trial of women involved with child welfare. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27(1), 51-58. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2004.03.010

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10296

Murphy, D. A., Chen, X., Naar-King, S., & Parsons, J. T. (2012). Alcohol and marijuana use outcomes in the healthy choices motivational interviewing intervention for hiv-positive youth. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 26(2), 95-100. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/apc.2011.0157

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10297

Ondersma, S. J., Svikis, D. S., & Schuster, C. R. (2007). Computer-based brief intervention: A randomized trial with postpartum women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(3), 231-238. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.11.003

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10298

Ondersma, S. J., Winhusen, T., Erickson, S. J., Stine, S. M., & Wang, Y. (2009). Motivation enhancement therapy with pregnant substance-abusing women: Does baseline motivation moderate efficacy? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 101(1-2), 74-79. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.11.004

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10300

Peterson, P. L., Baer, J. S., Wells, E. A., Ginzler, J. A., & Garrett, S. B. (2006). Short-term effects of a brief motivational intervention to reduce alcohol and drug risk among homeless adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20(3), 254-264. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.20.3.254

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10301

Robeles, R. R., Reyes, J. C., Colón, H. M., Sahai, H., Marrero, C. A., Matos, T. D., . . . Shepard, E. W. (2004). Effects of combined counseling and case management to reduce hiv risk behaviors among hispanic drug injectors in puerto rico: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27(2), 145-152. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2004.06.004

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10304

Satre, D. D., Delucchi, K., Lichtmacher, J., Sterling, S. A., & Weisner, C. (2013). Motivational interviewing to reduce hazardous drinking and drug use among depression patients. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44(3), 323-329. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2012.08.008

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10305

Satre, D. D., Leibowitz, A., Sterling, S. A., Lu, Y., Travis, A., & Weisner, C. (2016). A randomized clinical trial of motivational interviewing to reduce alcohol and drug use among patients with depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(7), 571-579. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000096

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10306

Saunders, B., Wilkinson, C., & Phillips, M. (1995). The impact of a brief motivational intervention with opiate users attending a methadone programme. Addiction, 90(3), 415-424. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb03788.x

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10307

Schneider, R. J., Casey, J., & Kohn, R. (2000). Motivational versus confrontational interviewing: A comparison of substance abuse assessment practices at employee assistance programs. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 27(1), 60-74.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10308

Seal, K. H., Abadjian, L., McCamish, N., Shi, Y., Tarasovsky, G., & Weingardt, K. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of telephone motivational interviewing to enhance mental health treatment engagement in iraq and afghanistan veterans. General Hospital Psychiatry, 34(5), 450-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.04.007

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10310

Slesnick, N., Erdem, G., Bartle-Haring, S., & Brigham, G. S. (2013). Intervention with substance-abusing runaway adolescents and their families: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(4), 600-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033463

Slesnick, N., Guo, X., & Feng, X. (2013). Change in parent- and child-reported internalizing and externalizing behaviors among substance abusing runaways: The effects of family and individual treatments. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 980-993. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9826-z

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10312

Sorsdahl, K., Stein, D. J., Corrigall, J., Cuijpers, P., Smits, N., Naledi, T., & Myers, B. (2015). The efficacy of a blended motivational interviewing and problem solving therapy intervention to reduce substance use among patients presenting for emergency services in south africa: A randomized controlled trial. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 10.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10313

Stein, L. A. R., Clair, M., Lebeau, R., Colby, S. M., Barnett, N. P., Golembeske, C., & Monti, P. M. (2011). Motivational interviewing to reduce substance-related consequences: Effects for incarcerated adolescents with depressed mood. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 118(2-3), 475-478. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.03.023

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10314

Stein, L. A. R., Colby, S. M., Barnett, N. P., Monti, P. M., Golembeske, C., & Lebeau-Craven, R. (2006). Effects of motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents on driving under the influence after release. The American Journal on Addictions, 15(Suppl 1), 50-57. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10550490601003680

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10315

Stein, L. A. R., Lebeau, R., Colby, U. M., Barnett, N. P., Golembeske, C., & Monti, P. M. (2011). Motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents: Effects of depressive symptoms on reducing alcohol and marijuana use after release. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(3), 497-506. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2011.72.497

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10316

Stein, M. D., Caviness, C. M., Morse, E. F., Grimone, K. R., Audet, D., Herman, D. S., . . . Anderson, B. J. (2017). A developmental‐based motivational intervention to reduce alcohol and marijuana use among non‐treatment‐seeking young adults: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(3), 440-453. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14026

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10322

Sterk, C. E., Theall, K. P., & Elifson, K. W. (2006). The impact of emotional distress on hiv risk reduction among women. Substance Use & Misuse, 41(2), 157-173. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10826080500391639

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10323

Stewart, D. G., Siebert, E. C., Arlt, V. K., Moise-Campbell, C., & Lehinger, E. (2016). Ready or not: Findings from a school-based MI intervention for adolescent substance use. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 71, 23-29. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2016.08.007

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10324

Stotts, A. L., Potts, G. F., Ingersoll, G., George, M. R., & Martin, L. E. (2006). Preliminary feasibility and efficacy of a brief motivational intervention with psychophysiological feedback for cocaine abuse. Substance Abuse, 27(4), 9-20.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10325

Swogger, M. T., Conner, K. R., Caine, E. D., Trabold, N., Parkhurst, M. N., Prothero, L. M., & Maisto, S. A. (2016). A test of core psychopathic traits as a moderator of the efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for substance-using offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(3), 248-258. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000065

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10326

Taxman, F. S., Walters, S. T., Sloas, L. B., Lerch, J., & Rodriguez, M. (2015). Motivational tools to improve probationer treatment outcomes. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 43, 120-128. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.016

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10327

Valente, J. Y., Moreira, T. C., Ferigolo, M., & Barros, H. M. T. (2018). Randomized clinical trial to change parental practices for drug use in a telehealth prevention program: A pilot study. Jornal De Pediatria. doi:10.1016/j.jped.2018.02.004

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10328

Vallersnes, O. M., Bjornaas, M. A., Lund, C., Jacobsen, D., Ekeberg, Ø., & Brekke, M. (2016). Follow-up of young patients after acute poisoning by substances of abuse: A comparative cohort study at an emergency outpatient clinic. BMC Research Notes, 9, 398. doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2200-6

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10329

Vederhus, J. K., Timko, C., Kristensen, Ø., Hjemdahl, B., & Clausen, T. (2014). Motivational intervention to enhance post‐detoxification 12‐step group affiliation: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 109(5), 766-773. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.12471

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10330

Venner, K. L., Greenfield, B. L., Hagler, K. J., Simmons, J., Lupee, D., Homer, E., . . . Smith, J. E. (2016). Pilot outcome results of culturally adapted evidence-based substance use disorder treatment with a southwest tribe. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 3, 21-27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2015.11.002

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10331

Walters, S. T., Vader, A. M., Nguyen, N., Harris, T. R., & Eells, J. (2010). Motivational interviewing as a supervision strategy in probation: A randomized effectiveness trial. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49(5), 309-323. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2010.489455

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10333

Wernette, G. T., Plegue, M., Kahler, C. W., Sen, A., & Zlotnick, C. (2018). A pilot randomized controlled trial of a computer-delivered brief intervention for substance use and risky sex during pregnancy. Journal of Women's Health, 27(1), 83-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2017.6408

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10334

Woodruff, S. I., Clapp, J. D., Eisenberg, K., McCabe, C., Hohman, M., Shillington, A. M., . . . Gareri, J. (2014). Randomized clinical trial of the effects of screening and brief intervention for illicit drug use: The Life Shift/Shift Gears study. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 9, 8. doi:10.1186/1940-0640-9-8

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10336

Zorland, J. L., Gilmore, D., Johnson, J. A., Borgman, R., Emshoff, J., Akin, J., . . . Kuperminc, G. P. (2018). Effects of substance use screening and brief intervention on health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 27(9), 2329-2336. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1899-z

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10337

Zuckoff, A., Shear, K., Frank, E., Daley, D. C., Seligman, K., & Silowash, R. (2006). Treating complicated grief and substance use disorders: A pilot study. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30(3), 205-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2005.12.001

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10338

Zule, W. A., Costenbader, E. C., Coomes, C. M., & Wechsberg, W. M. (2009). Effects of a Hepatitis C virus educational intervention or a motivational intervention on alcohol use, injection drug use, and sexual risk behaviors among injection drug users. American Journal of Public Health, 99, S180-186. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.126854

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10399

Baer, J. S., Marlatt, G. A., Kivlahan, D. R., Fromme, K., Larimer, M. E., & Williams, E. (1992). An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(6), 974-979.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10403

Bazargan-Hejazi, S., Bing, E., Bazargan, M., Der-Martirosian, C., Hardin, E., Bernstein, J., & Bernstein, E. (2005). Evaluation of a brief intervention in an inner-city emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 46(1), 67-76.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10405

Cherpitel, C. J., Ye, Y., Bond, J., Woolard, R., Woolard, R., Villalobos, S., Bernstein, J., Bernstein, E., & Ramos, R. (2016). Brief intervention in the emergency department among Mexican-origin young adults at the US-Mexico border: Outcomes of a randomized clinical trial using promotores. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 51(2), 154-163. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agv084

Bernstein, J., Bernstein, E., Hudson, D., Belanoff, C., Cabral, H. J., Cherpitel, C. J., . . . Ramos, R. (2017). Differences by gender at twelve months in a brief intervention trial among Mexican-origin young adults in the emergency department. Journal Of Ethnicity In Substance Abuse, 16(1), 91-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2015.1095667

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10408

Bombardier, C. H., Cunniffe, M., Wadhwani, R., Gibbons, L. E., Blake, K. D., & Kraft, G. H. (2008). The efficacy of telephone counseling for health promotion in people with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 89(10), 1849-1856.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10409

Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2000). Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 728-733. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.4.728

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10410

Borsari, B., Hustad, J. T. P., Mastroleo, N. R., Tevyaw, T. O. L., Barnett, N. P., Kahler, C. W., . . . Monti, P. M. (2012). Addressing alcohol use and problems in mandated college students: A randomized clinical trial using stepped care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80(6), 1062-1074. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029902

Borsari, B., Magill, M., Mastroleo, N. R., Hustad, J. T. P., Tevyaw, T. O. L., Barnett, N. P., . . . Monti, P. M. (2016). Mandated college students’ response to sequentially administered alcohol interventions in a randomized clinical trial using stepped care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(2), 103-112. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0039800

Yurasek, A. M., Borsari, B., Magill, M., Mastroleo, N. R., Hustad, J. T. P., Tevyaw, T. O. L., . . . Monti, P. M. (2015). Descriptive norms and expectancies as mediators of a brief motivational intervention for mandated college students receiving stepped care for alcohol use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(4), 1003-1011. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/adb0000092

Borsari, B., Merrill, J. E., Yurasek, A., Miller, M. B., & Carey, K. B. (2016). Does a brief motivational intervention reduce frequency of pregaming in mandated students? Substance Use & Misuse, 51(8), 1056-1066. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2016.1152494

Yurasek, A. M., Merrill, J. E., Metrik, J., Miller, M. B., Fernandez, A. C., & Borsari, B. (2017). Marijuana use in the context of alcohol interventions for mandated college students. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 79, 53-60. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.015

Teeters, J. B., Borsari, B., Martens, M. P., & Murphy, J. G. (2015). Brief motivational interventions are associated with reductions in alcohol-impaired driving among college drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 76(5), 700-709. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2015.76.700

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10413

Bradley, K. A., Bobb, J. F., Ludman, E. J., Chavez, L. J., Saxon, A. J., Merrill, J. O., . . . Kivlahan, D. R. (2018). Alcohol-related nurse care management in primary care: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(5), 613-621. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0388

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10415

Bruguera, P., Barrio, P., Oliveras, C., Braddick, F., Gavotti, C., Bruguera, C., . . . Gual, A. (2018). Effectiveness of a specialized brief intervention for at-risk drinkers in an emergency department: Short-term results of a randomized controlled trial. Academic Emergency Medicine, 25(5), 517-525. doi:10.1111/acem.13384

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10416

Bucci, S., Baker, A., Halpin, S. A., Hides, L., Lewin, T. J., Carr, V. J., & Startup, M. (2010). Intervention for cannabis use in young people at ultra high risk for psychosis and in early psychosis. Mental Health and Substance Use, 3(1), 66-73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17523280903523983

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10417

Butler, C. C., Simpson, S. A., Hood, K., Cohen, D., Pickles, T., Spanou, C., . . . Rollnick, S. (2013). Training practitioners to deliver opportunistic multiple behaviour change counselling in primary care: A cluster randomised trial. British Medical Journal, 346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1191

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10419

Carey, K. B., Henson, J. M., Carey, M. P., & Maisto, S. A. (2009). Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(1), 74-87. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014281

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10421

Carey, K. B., DeMartini, K. S., Prince, M. A., Luteran, C., & Carey, M. P. (2013). Effects of choice on intervention outcomes for college students sanctioned for campus alcohol policy violations. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(3), 596-603. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030333

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10424

Colby, S. M., Orchowski, L., Magill, M., Murphy, J. G., Brazil, L. A., Apodaca, T. R., . . . Barnett, N. P. (2018). Brief motivational intervention for underage young adult drinkers: Results from a randomized clinical trial. Alcoholism, 42(7), 1342-1351. doi:10.1111/acer.13770

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10425

Collins, S. E., & Carey, K. B. (2005). Lack of effect for decisional balance as a brief motivational intervention for at-risk college drinkers. Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1425-1430. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.01.004

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10429

Daeppen, J.-B., Bertholet, N., Gaume, J., Fortini, C., Faouzi, M., & Gmel, G. (2011). Efficacy of brief motivational intervention in reducing binge drinking in young men: A randomized controlled trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 113(1), 69-75. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.009

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10431

de Oliveira Christoff, A., & Boerngen-Lacerda, R. (2015). Reducing substance involvement in college students: A three-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial of a computer-based intervention. Addictive Behaviors, 45, 164-171. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.019

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10432

Dent, A. W., Weiland, T. J., Phillips, G. A., & Lee, N. K. (2008). Opportunistic screening and clinician-delivered brief intervention for high-risk alcohol use among emergency department attendees: A randomized controlled trial. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 20(2), 121-128. doi:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01067.x

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10433

Dermen, K. H., & Thomas, S. N. (2011). Randomized controlled trial of brief interventions to reduce college students' drinking and risky sex. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25(4), 583-594. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025472

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10434

Désy, P. M., Howard, P. K., Perhats, C., & Li, S. (2010). Alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment conducted by emergency nurses: An impact evaluation. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 36(6), 538-545. doi:10.1016/j.jen.2009.09.011

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10445

Fleming, M. F., Balousek, S. L., Grossberg, P. M., Mundt, M. P., Brown, D., Wiegel, J. R., . . . Saewyc, E. M. (2010). Brief physician advice for heavy drinking college students: A randomized controlled trial in college health clinics. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71(1), 23-31. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2010.71.23

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10447

Garner, B. R., Gotham, H. J., Tueller, S. J., Ball, E. L., Kaiser, D., Stilen, P., . . . Martino, S. (2017). Testing the effectiveness of a motivational interviewing-based brief intervention for substance use as an adjunct to usual care in community-based aids service organizations: Study protocol for a multisite randomized controlled trial. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 12(1), 31-31. doi:10.1186/s13722-017-0095-8

This study is ineligible for review because it does not report program or service impacts on an eligible target outcome (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.5).

Study 10451

Gilder, D. A., Geisler, J. R., Luna, J. A., Calac, D., Monti, P. M., Spillane, N. S., . . . Ehlers, C. L. (2017). A pilot randomized trial of motivational interviewing compared to psycho-education for reducing and preventing underage drinking in American Indian adolescents. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 82, 74-81. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.09.004

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10452

Goodall, C. A., Ayoub, A. F., Crawford, A., Smith, I., Bowman, A., Koppel, D., & Gilchrist, G. (2008). Nurse-delivered brief interventions for hazardous drinkers with alcohol-related facial trauma: A prospective randomised controlled trial. The British Journal Of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 46(2), 96-101.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10454

Graeber, D. A., Moyers, T. B., Griffith, G., Guajardo, E., & Tonigan, S. (2003). A pilot study comparing motivational interviewing and an educational intervention in patients with schizophrenia and alcohol use disorders. Community Mental Health Journal, 39(3), 189-202. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023371705506

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10456

Hagger, M. S., Lonsdale, A., Koka, A., Hein, V., Pasi, H., Lintunen, T., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2012). An intervention to reduce alcohol consumption in undergraduate students using implementation intentions and mental simulations: A cross-national study. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 19(1), 82-96. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9163-8

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10463

Joya, X., Mazarico, E., Ramis, J., Pacifici, R., Salat-Batlle, J., Mortali, C., . . . Pichini, S. (2016). Segmental hair analysis to assess effectiveness of single-session motivational intervention to stop ethanol use during pregnancy. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 158, 45-51. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.10.028

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10465

Kavanagh, D. J., Young, R., White, A., Saunders, J. B., Wallis, J., Shockley, N., . . . Clair, A. (2004). A brief motivational intervention for substance misuse in recent-onset psychosis. Drug and Alcohol Review, 23(2), 151-155. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09595230410001704127

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10466

Kaysen, D. L., Lee, C. M., Labrie, J. W., & Tollison, S. J. (2009). Readiness to change drinking behavior in female college students. Journal Of Studies On Alcohol And Drugs. Supplement(16), 106-114.

LaBrie, J. W., Huchting, K., Tawalbeh, S., Pedersen, E. R., Thompson, A. D., Shelesky, K., Larimer, M., & Neighbors, C. (2008). A randomized motivational enhancement prevention group reduces drinking and alcohol consequences in first-year college women. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22(1), 149-155. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.1.149

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10467

Kazemi, D., Dmochowski, J., Sun, L., Nies, M., & Walford, S. (2011). Outcomes of a Targeted Capacity Expansion (TCE) brief motivational intervention for high-risk drinking freshmen: Pilot study comparison at baseline and 6 months. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 29(3), 219-229. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2011.586275

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10469

Kulesza, M., Apperson, M., Larimer, M. E., & Copeland, A. L. (2010). Brief alcohol intervention for college drinkers: How brief is brief? Addictive Behaviors, 35(7), 730-733. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.011

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10470

Leukefeld, C., Roberto, H., Hiller, M., Webster, M., Logan, T. K., & Staton-Tindall, M. (2003). HIV prevention among high-risk and hard-to-reach rural residents. Journal Of Psychoactive Drugs, 35(4), 427-434.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10471

Linakis, J. G., Bromberg, J., Baird, J., Nirenberg, T. D., Chun, T. H., Mello, M. J., . . . Spirito, A. (2013). Feasibility and acceptability of a pediatric emergency department alcohol prevention intervention for young adolescents. Pediatric Emergency Care, 29(11), 1180-1188. doi:10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182a9f7da

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10472

Longabaugh, R., Woolard, R. F., Nirenberg, T. D., Minugh, A. P., Becker, B., Clifford, P. R., . . . Gogineni, A. (2001). Evaluating the effects of a brief motivational intervention for injured drinkers in the emergency department. Journal Of Studies On Alcohol, 62(6), 806-816. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2001.62.806

Stein, L. A. R., Minugh, P. A., Longabaugh, R., Wirtz, P., Baird, J., Nirenberg, T. D., . . . Gogineni, A. (2009). Readiness to change as a mediator of the effect of a brief motivational intervention on posttreatment alcohol-related consequences of injured emergency department hazardous drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(2), 185-195. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015648

Mellow, M. J., Nirenberg, T. D., Longabaugh, R., Woolard, R., Minugh, A., Becker, B., . . . Stein, L. (2005). Emergency department brief motivational interventions for alcohol with motor vehicle crash patients. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 45(6), 620-625.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10473

Madhombiro, M., Dube-Marimbe, B., Dube, M., Chibanda, D., Zunza, M., Rusakaniko, S., . . . Seedat, S. (2017). A cluster randomised controlled trial protocol of an adapted intervention for alcohol use disorders in people living with HIV and AIDS: Impact on alcohol use, general functional ability, quality of life and adherence to HAART. BMC Psychiatry, 17.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10474

Magill, M., Barnett, N. P., Apodaca, T. R., Rohsenow, D. J., & Monti, P. M. (2009). The role of marijuana use in brief motivational intervention with young adult drinkers treated in an emergency department. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70(3), 409-413. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2009.70.409

Monti, P. M., Barnett, N. P., Colby, S. M., Gwaltney, C. J., Spirito, A., Rohsenow, D. J., & Woolard, R. (2007). Motivational interviewing versus feedback only in emergency care for young adult problem drinking. Addiction 102, 1234-1243.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10478

McNally, A. M., Palfai, T. P., & Kahler, C. W. (2005). Motivational interventions for heavy drinking college students: Examining the role of discrepancy-related psychological processes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19(1), 79-87. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.19.1.79

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10481

Miller, W. R., Benefield, R. G., & Tonigan, J. S. (1993). Enhancing motivation for change in problem drinking: A controlled comparison of two therapist styles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 455-461. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.61.3.455

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10484

Morgenstern, J., Bux, D. A., Jr., Parsons, J., Hagman, B. T., Wainberg, M., & Irwin, T. (2009). Randomized trial to reduce club drug use and HIV risk behaviors among men who have sex with men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 645-656. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015588

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10485

Morgenstern, J., Irwin, T. W., Wainberg, M. L., Parsons, J. T., Muench, F., Bux, D. A., Jr., . . . Schulz-Heik, J. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of goal choice interventions for alcohol use disorders among men who have sex with men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(1), 72-84. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.1.72

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10486

Morgenstern, J., Kuerbis, A., Amrhein, P., Hail, L., Lynch, K., & McKay, J. R. (2012). Motivational interviewing: A pilot test of active ingredients and mechanisms of change. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(4), 859-869. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029674

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10487

Morgenstern, J., Kuerbis, A., Houser, J., Levak, S., Amrhein, P., Shao, S., & McKay, J. R. (2017). Dismantling motivational interviewing: Effects on initiation of behavior change among problem drinkers seeking treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31(7), 751-762. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/adb0000317

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10488

Mullins, S. M., Suarez, M., Ondersma, S. J., & Page, M. C. (2004). The impact of motivational interviewing on substance abuse treatment retention: A randomized control trial of women involved with child welfare. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27(1), 51-58. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2004.03.010

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10489

Murphy, D. A., Chen, X., Naar-King, S., & Parsons, J. T. (2012). Alcohol and marijuana use outcomes in the Healthy Choices motivational interviewing intervention for HIV-positive youth. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 26(2), 95-100. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/apc.2011.0157

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10490

Murphy, J. G., Dennhardt, A. A., Skidmore, J. R., Martens, M. P., & McDevitt-Murphy, M. E. (2010). Computerized versus motivational interviewing alcohol interventions: Impact on discrepancy, motivation, and drinking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24(4), 628-639. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021347

Murphy, J. G., Dennhardt, A. A., Yurasek, A. M., Skidmore, J. R., Martens, M. P., MacKillop, J., & McDevitt-Murphy, M. E. (2015). Behavioral economic predictors of brief alcohol intervention outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(6), 1033-1043. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000032

Teeters, J. B., Borsari, B., Martens, M. P., & Murphy, J. G. (2015). Brief motivational interventions are associated with reductions in alcohol-impaired driving among college drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 76(5), 700-709. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2015.76.700

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10492

Nirenberg, T., Longabaugh, R., Baird, J., & Mello, M. J. (2013). Treatment may influence self-report and jeopardize our understanding of outcome. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 74(5), 770-776. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2013.74.770

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10498

Floyd, R. L., Sobell, M., Velasquez, M. M., Ingersoll, K., Nettleman, M., Sobell, L., …, Project CHOICES Efficacy Study Group. (2007). American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.028

Parrish, D. E., von Sternberg, K., Castro, Y., & Velasquez, M. M. (2016). Processes of change in preventing alcohol exposed pregnancy: A mediation analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(9), 803-812. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000111

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10500

Parsons, J. T., Lelutiu-Weinberger, C., Botsko, M., & Golub, S. A. (2014). A randomized controlled trial utilizing motivational interviewing to reduce HIV risk and drug use in young gay and bisexual men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(1), 9-18. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035311

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10501

Ponsford, J., Tweedly, L., Lee, N., & Taffe, J. (2012). Who responds better? Factors influencing a positive response to brief alcohol interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 27(5), 342-348. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e318265a576

Tweedly, L., Ponsford, J., & Lee, N. (2012). Investigation of the effectiveness of brief interventions to reduce alcohol consumption following traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 27(5), 331-341. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e318262200a

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10502

Prince, M. A., Maisto, S. A., Rice, S. L., & Carey, K. B. (2015). Development of a face-to-face injunctive norms brief motivational intervention for college drinkers and preliminary outcomes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(4), 825-835. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/adb0000118

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10504

Rhodes, K. V., Rodgers, M., Sommers, M., Hanlon, A., & Crits-Christoph, P. (2014). The Social Health Intervention Project (SHIP): Protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of a brief motivational intervention for problem drinking and intimate partner violence in an urban emergency department. BMC Emergency Medicine, 14(1), 10. doi:10.1186/1471-227X-14-10

Rhodes, K. V., Rodgers, M., Sommers, M., Hanlon, A., Chittams, J., Doyle, A., . . . Crits-Christoph, P. (2015). Brief motivational intervention for intimate partner violence and heavy drinking in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 314(5), 466-477. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.8369

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10506

Richmond, R., Heather, N., Wodak, A., Kehoe, L., & Webster, I. A. N. (1995). Controlled evaluation of a general practice-based brief intervention for excessive drinking. Addiction, 90(1), 119-132. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.90111915.x

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10507

Roked, Z., Moore, S., & Shepherd, J. (2015). Feasibility of alcohol misuse screening and treatment in the dental setting. Lancet, S84. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60399-3

This study is ineligible for review because it does not have an eligible source of publication (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 10508

Romo, L., Le Strat, Y., Aubry, C., Marquez, S., Houdeyer, K., Batel, P., . . . Gorwood, P. (2009). The role of brief motivational intervention on self-efficacy and abstinence in a cohort of patients with alcohol dependence. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 39(3), 313-323. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/PM.39.3.g

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10513

Schaus, J. F., Sole, M. L., McCoy, T. P., Mullett, N., & O'Brien, M. C. (2009). Alcohol screening and brief intervention in a college student health center: A randomized controlled trial. Journal Of Studies On Alcohol And Drugs. Supplement(16), 131-141.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10517

Sharp, D., & Atherton, S. R. (2006). Out on the town: An evaluation of brief motivational interventions to address the risks associated with problematic alcohol use. International journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(5), 540-558. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624X06288714

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10519

Smith, A. J., Hodgson, R. J., Bridgeman, K., & Shepherd, J. P. (2003). A randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention after alcohol-related facial injury. Addiction, 98(1), 43-52. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00251.x

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10521

Stahre, M. A., Toomey, T. L., Erickson, D. J., Forster, J. L., Okuyemi, K. S., & Ahluwalia, J. S. (2013). The effects of a tobacco intervention on binge drinking among African American light smokers. Journal Of Addictive Diseases, 32(4), 377-386. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2013.849972

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10525

Stephenson, R., Bonar, E. E., Carrico, A., Hunter, A., Connochie, D., Himmelstein, R., & Bauermeister, J. (2018). Intervention to increase HIV testing among substance-using young men who have sex with men: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 7(4), e114-e114. doi:10.2196/resprot.9414

This study is ineligible for review because it does not report program or service impacts on an eligible target outcome (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.5).

Study 10529

Terlecki, M. A., Larimer, M. E., & Copeland, A. L. (2010). Clinical outcomes of a brief motivational intervention for heavy drinking mandated college students: A pilot study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71(1), 54-60. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2010.71.54

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10531

Utter, G. H., Young, J. B., Theard, L. A., Cropp, D. M., Mohar, C. J., Eisenberg, D., . . . Owens, L. J. (2014). The effect on problematic drinking behavior of a brief motivational interview shortly after a first arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol: A randomized trial. Journal of Trauma & Acute Care Surgery, 76(3), 661-671. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000144

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10532

Vallersnes, O. M., Bjornaas, M. A., Lund, C., Jacobsen, D., Ekeberg, Ø., & Brekke, M. (2016). Follow-up of young patients after acute poisoning by substances of abuse: A comparative cohort study at an emergency outpatient clinic. BMC Research Notes, 9, 398. doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2200-6

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10534

Walton, M. A., Chermack, S. T., Shope, J. T., Bingham, C. R., Zimmerman, M. A., Blow, F. C., & Cunningham, R. M. (2010). Effects of a brief intervention for reducing violence and alcohol misuse among adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 304(5), 527-535. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1066

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10536

Wilke, D. J., Mennicke, A., Howell, R. L., & Magnuson, A. B. (2014). A peer-facilitated intervention to reduce risky drinking among fraternity and sorority members. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 14(1), 42-63. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2014.873323

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10538

Wood, M. D., Fairlie, A. M., Fernandez, A. C., Borsari, B., Capone, C., Laforge, R., & Carmona-Barros, R. (2010). Brief motivational and parent interventions for college students: A randomized factorial study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(3), 349-361. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019166

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10539

Woodruff, S. I., Eisenberg, K., McCabe, C. T., Clapp, J. D., & Hohman, M. (2013). Evaluation of California's alcohol and drug screening and brief intervention project for emergency department patients. The Western Journal Of Emergency Medicine, 14(3), 263-270. doi:10.5811/westjem.2012.9.11551

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10543

Audrain-McGovern, J., Stevens, S., Murray, P. J., Kinsman, S., Zuckoff, A., Pletcher, J., ... & Rodriguez, D. (2011). The efficacy of motivational interviewing versus brief advice for adolescent smoking behavior change. Pediatrics, 128(1), e101-e111. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2174

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 10544

Botzet, A. M., Dittel, C., Birkeland, R., Lee, S., Grabowski, J., & Winters, K. C.  (2019). Parents as interventionists: Addressing adolescent substance use. Journal Of Substance Abuse Treatment, 99, 124-133. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.015

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10548

Colby, S. M., Nargiso, J., Tevyaw, T. O. L., Barnett, N. P., Metrik, J., Lewander, W., ... & Monti, P. M. (2012). Enhanced motivational interviewing versus brief advice for adolescent smoking cessation: Results from a randomized clinical trial. Addictive Behaviors, 37(7), 817-823. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.03.011

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10549

Hedman, E., Riis, U., & Gabre, P. (2010). The impact of behavioural interventions on young people's attitudes toward tobacco use. Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry, 8(1), 23-32.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10551

Horn, K., Dino, G., Hamilton, C., Noerachmanto, N., Zhang, J. (2008). Feasibility of a smoking cessation intervention for teens in the emergency department: Reach, implementation fidelity, and acceptability. American Journal Of Critical Care: An Official Publication, American Association Of Critical-Care Nurses, 17(3), 205-216.

Horn, K., Dino, G., Hamilton, C., & Noerachmanto, N. (2007). Efficacy of emergency department-based motivational teenage smoking intervention.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 10554

Cunningham, R. M., Walton, M. A., Goldstein, A., Chermack, S. T., Shope, J. T., Bingham, C. R., … Blow, F. C. (2009). Three-month follow-up of brief computerized and therapist interventions for alcohol and violence among teens. Academic Emergency Medicine, 16(11), 1193-1207. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00513.x.

Cunningham, R. M., Chermack, S. T., Zimmerman, M. A., Shope, J. T., Bingham, C. R., Blow, F. C., & Walton, M. A. (2012). Brief motivational interviewing intervention for peer violence and alcohol use in teens: One-year follow-up. Pediatrics, 129(6), 1083-1090. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3419

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review