Ohio's Kinship Supports Intervention/ProtectOHIO

Target Population

Ohio’s Kinship Supports Intervention/ProtectOHIO targets kinship caregivers (relatives and fictive kin) of children involved in the child welfare system, regardless of custody status or supervision orders. Kinship caregivers may be relatives through blood, marriage, or adoption. Kinship caregivers may also be fictive kin, which includes non-relative adults with whom the family or child identifies as having a long-standing relationship. 

Dosage

Kinship coordinators conduct home assessments within 30 days of the child’s placement with the kinship caregiver and needs assessments every 90 days. Home assessments typically last 30 minutes and needs assessments last 15 minutes. Coordinators conduct monthly home visits with kinship caregivers (or more frequently based on need).

Location/Delivery Setting

Recommended Locations/Delivery Settings

Ohio’s Kinship Supports Intervention/ProtectOHIO is typically offered in participants’ homes and child welfare agencies.

Location/Delivery Settings Observed in the Research

• Home

Education, Certifications and Training

Kinship coordinators are expected to have a knowledge of child welfare practices and experience working with children/families in the child welfare system. No additional education is required.

All kinship coordinators must complete self-directed training through the Ohio Child Welfare Training Program. This program involves seven modules: 1) Overview of ProtectOHIO, 2) Kinship Intervention Overview, 3) Enhancing the Kinship Support Intervention, 4) Kinship Caregiver Home Assessment, 5) Needs Assessment, 6) Home Visits and Support Services, and 7) Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System.

Program or Service Documentation

Book/Manual/Available documentation used for review

ProtectOHIO. (2011). Practice manual for ProtectOHIO Kinship Supports Intervention.

Available languages

Materials for Ohio’s Kinship Supports Intervention/ProtectOHIO are available in English.

For More Information

Website: jfs.ohio.gov/ocf/index.stm

Note: The details on Dosage; Location; Education, Certifications, and Training; Other Supporting Materials; and For More Information sections above are provided to website users for informational purposes only. This information is not exhaustive and may be subject to change.

Results of Search and Review	Number of Studies Identified and Reviewed for Ohio's Kinship Supports Intervention/ProtectOHIO
Identified in Search	2
Eligible for Review	2
Rated High	0
Rated Moderate	1
Rated Low	1
Reviewed Only for Risk of Harm	0

Outcome	Effect Size and Implied Percentile Effect	N of Studies (Findings)	N of Participants	Summary of Findings
Child permanency: Out-of-home placement	0.11 4	1 (3)	1610	Favorable: 0 No Effect: 3 Unfavorable: 0
Child permanency: Placement stability	0.13 5	1 (3)	1610	Favorable: 3 No Effect: 0 Unfavorable: 0

Note: For the effect sizes and implied percentile effects reported in the table, a positive number favors the intervention group and a negative number favors the comparison group.

Outcome	Effect Size and Implied Percentile Effect	N of Studies (Findings)	N of Participants	Summary of Findings	Months after treatment when outcome measured
Child permanency: Out-of-home placement	0.11 4	1 (3)	1610	Favorable: 0 No Effect: 3 Unfavorable: 0	-
Study 12553 - ProtectOHIO vs. Treatment As Usual (Wheeler, 2020)
Re-Entry Into Out-of-Home Care	0.11 4	-	1610	-	6
Re-Entry Into Out-of-Home Care	0.13 5	-	1610	-	12
Re-Entry Into Out-of-Home Care	0.10 4	-	1610	-	24
Child permanency: Placement stability	0.13 5	1 (3)	1610	Favorable: 3 No Effect: 0 Unfavorable: 0	-
Study 12553 - ProtectOHIO vs. Treatment As Usual (Wheeler, 2020)
Length of Time in Out-of-Home Care	0.20 * 7	-	1610	-	0
Placement Stability: Number of Moves During Placement Episode	0.10 * 3	-	1610	-	0
Placement Stability: Any Change in Placement	0.10 * 3	-	1610	-	0

*p <.05

Note: For the effect sizes and implied percentile effects reported in the table, a positive number favors the intervention group and a negative number favors the comparison group. Effect sizes and implied percentile effects were calculated by the Prevention Services Clearinghouse as described in the Handbook of Standards and Procedures, Version 1.0, Section 5.10.4 and may not align with effect sizes reported in individual publications. The Prevention Services Clearinghouse uses information reported in study documents and, when necessary, information provided by authors in response to author queries to assign study ratings and calculate effect sizes and statistical significance (see Section 7.3.2 in the Handbook of Standards and Procedures, Version 1.0). As a result, the effect sizes and statistical significance reported in the table may not align with the estimates as they are reported in study documents.

Only publications with eligible contrasts that met design and execution standards are included in the individual study findings table.

Full citations for the studies shown in the table are available in the "Studies Reviewed" section.

The participant characteristics display is an initial version. We encourage those interested in providing feedback to send suggestions to preventionservices@abtglobal.com.

The table below displays locations, the year, and participant demographics for studies that received moderate or high ratings on design and execution and that reported the information. Participant characteristics for studies with more than one intervention versus comparison group pair that received moderate or high ratings are shown separately in the table. Please note, the information presented here uses terminology directly from the study documents, when available. Studies that received moderate or high ratings on design and execution that did not include relevant participant demographic information would not be represented in this table.

For more information on how Clearinghouse reviewers record the information in the table, please see our Resource Guide on Study Participant Characteristics and Settings.

Characteristics of the Participants in the Studies with Moderate or High Ratings
Study Location	Study Year	Age or Grade-level	Race, Ethnicity, Nationality	Gender	Populations of Interest*	Household Socioeconomic Status
Study 12553 - ProtectOHIO vs. Treatment As Usual
Characteristics of the Children and Youth
Ohio, USA	2012	Average age of child at transfer to ongoing services: 4 years	41% Minority (Child’s race is Black, Asian, American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, Multiracial)	49% Female	100% Part of cases involving substantiated or indicated abuse or neglect and were placed into out-of-home kinship care; 49% Physical abuse allegation was substantiated, indicated, or abuse risk for this CAN report, 38% Emotional maltreatment allegation was substantiated, indicated, or abuse risk for this CAN report	--

“--” indicates information not reported in the study.

* The information about disabilities is based on initial coding. For more information on how the Clearinghouse recorded disability information for the initial release, please see our Resource Guide on Study Participant Characteristics and Settings. The Clearinghouse is currently seeking consultation from experts, including those with lived experience, and input from the public to enhance and improve the display.

Note: Citations for the documents associated with each 5-digit study number shown in the table can be found in the “Studies Reviewed” section below. Study settings and participant demographics are recorded for all studies that received moderate or high ratings on design and execution and that reported the information. Studies that did not report any information about setting or participant demographics are not displayed. For more information on how participant characteristics are recorded, please see our Resource Guide on Study Participant Characteristics and Settings.

Sometimes study results are reported in more than one document, or a single document reports results from multiple studies. Studies are identified below by their Prevention Services Clearinghouse study identification numbers. To receive a rating of supported or well-supported, the favorable evidence for a program or service must have been obtained from research conducted in a usual care or practice setting.

Studies Rated Moderate

Study 12553

Wheeler, C. B., Newton-Curtis, L., Forehand, G., Oliver, S., Mendoza, G., & Hervey, K. (2020). ProtectOHIO final evaluation report: Ohio's Title IV-E waiver demonstration project.

This study was conducted in a usual care or practice setting (Handbook Section 6.2.2)

Studies Rated Low

Study 10563

Wheeler, C., & Vollet, J. W. (2017). Supporting kinship caregivers: Examining the impact of a Title IV-E waiver kinship supports intervention. Child Welfare, 95(4), 91-110.

Wheeler, C. B., Newton-Curtis, L., Schisler, A., Vollet, J., Mettenberg, J., Woodruff, K. D., Das, B. … Zhou, X. (2015). ProtectOHIO Final Evaluation Report: Ohio’s Title IV-E Waiver Demonstration Project. Columbus, OH: The Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.

This study received a low rating because baseline equivalence of the intervention and comparison groups was necessary and not demonstrated.