Strengthening Families Program – 6-11

Mental Health Substance Use Prevention or Treatment Does Not Currently Meet Criteria

The Strengthening Families Program – 6-11 (SFP 6-11) is a parent and family skills training program designed to serve families with children ages 6–11. The program is designed to serve the general population and at-risk families, including families experiencing parental substance use issues and child behavioral problems. SFP 6-11 aims to help parents increase their children’s protective factors, such as coping skills, and reduce their children’s risk factors, such as behavioral problems.

 

SFP 6-11 consists of multi-family group sessions. Before each session, families and trained group leaders have a sit-down meal together where group leaders provide support, guidance, and praise and get to know families on a more personal level. Each session contains three components: parent skills training, children’s skills training, and family skills training. During the first half of each session, parents and children meet separately for parent skills training and children’s skills training, held simultaneously. During the second half of each session, parents and children meet together for family skills training.

 

During parent skills training, trained group leaders teach parents skills to promote positive child behavior. Skills include how to use rewards, set limits, communicate, and problem solve. During children’s skills training, trained group leaders teach children social, communication, refusal, problem solving, and coping skills.

 

During family skills training, families participate in structured activities, including child-directed play and parent-led arts and crafts. These activities provide an opportunity for families to practice the skills they learned during the first half of the session and receive support and guidance from group leaders. Additionally, parents are asked to practice these skills with their children in between group sessions, if possible.


SFP 6-11 does not currently meet criteria to receive a rating because no studies met eligibility criteria for review.


Date Research Evidence Last Reviewed: Mar 2022


Sources

The program or service description, target population, and program or service delivery and implementation information were informed by the following sources: the program or service manuals, the program or service developer’s website, and the California Evidence Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare.


This information does not necessarily represent the views of the program or service developers. For more information on how this program or service was reviewed, visit the download the Handbook of Standards and Procedures, Version 1.0

Target Population

SFP 6-11 is designed to serve the general population and at-risk families with children ages 6–11, including, but not limited to, families experiencing parental substance use issues and child behavioral problems.

 

Dosage

SFP 6-11 is delivered over 14 weekly multi-family group sessions of at least four families and no more than 14 families. The recommended group size is 6–12 families depending on site and implementation-specific factors. Each session lasts approximately 2 hours. Trained group leaders may offer optional booster sessions to families or facilitate ongoing family support groups once families have completed the 14-week program.

Location/Delivery Setting
Recommended Locations/Delivery Settings

SFP 6-11 can be delivered in a range of settings, including schools, churches, community centers, and community-based organizations.

Education, Certifications and Training

During each session, two trained group leaders facilitate the parent skills training group, and at least two group leaders facilitate the children’s skills training group. Group facilitation skills and experience working with or parenting children is recommended. It is also helpful for group leaders to have knowledge of behavioral psychology or token economies.

Group leaders are encouraged to complete a 2-day training prior to delivering SFP 6-11. Trainings are facilitated by Master SFP Trainers. After training, it is recommended that SFP Purveyors conduct site visits to evaluate new group leaders’ fidelity to the program model. SFP Purveyors also provide implementation supports including technical assistance, program evaluation, fidelity monitoring, site visits, and quality assurance.

Program or Service Documentation
Book/Manual/Available documentation used for review

The Implementation Manual is implemented in conjunction with the Parent Skills Training, Children’s Skills Training, and Family Skills Training Group Leader’s Manuals.

Kumpfer, K. L. (2017). The Strengthening Families Program: Implementation manual. Alta Institute.

Kumpfer, K. L. (2015). The Strengthening Families Program 6-11: Parent skills training, group leader’s manual. Alta Institute.

Kumpfer, K. L. (2015). The Strengthening Families Program 6-11: Children's skills training, group leader’s manual. Alta Institute.

Kumpfer, K. L. (2015). The Strengthening Families Program 6-11: Family skills training, group leader’s manual. Alta Institute.

Available languages

SFP 6-11 manuals are available in English, Arabic, French, German, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, and Thai.

Other supporting materials

About the Strengthening Families Program

Training Information

Frequently Asked Questions

 

For More Information

Website: www.strengtheningfamiliesprogram.org

Email: strengtheningfamiliestraining@gmail.com

 


Note: The details on Dosage; Location; Education, Certifications, and Training; Other Supporting Materials; and For More Information sections above are provided to website users for informational purposes only. This information is not exhaustive and may be subject to change.

Results of Search and Review Number of Studies Identified and Reviewed for Strengthening Families Program – 6-11
Identified in Search 55
Eligible for Review 0
Rated High 0
Rated Moderate 0
Rated Low 0
Reviewed Only for Risk of Harm 0

Sometimes study results are reported in more than one document, or a single document reports results from multiple studies. Studies are identified below by their Prevention Services Clearinghouse study identification numbers. To receive a rating of supported or well-supported, the favorable evidence for a program or service must have been obtained from research conducted in a usual care or practice setting.




Studies Not Eligible for Review

Study 11334

Ahearn Greene, J., Kumpfer, K., Cofrin, K. A., & Xie, J. (2015). Strengthening Families Program initiative: Year 04 evaluation report. Ahearn Greene Associates, LP. 

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 11335

Brook, J., McDonald, T. P., & Yan, Y. (2012). An analysis of the impact of the Strengthening Families Program on family reunification in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 691-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.018

Johnson-Motoyama, M., Brook, J., Yan, Y., & McDonald, T. P. (2013). Cost analysis of the strengthening families program in reducing time to family reunification among substance-affected families. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(2), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.11.008

Akin, B. A., Brook, J., Lloyd, M. H., & McDonald, T. P. (2017). Effect of a parenting intervention on foster care reentry after reunification among substance-affected families: A quasi-experimental study. Child Maltreatment, 22(3), 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559517702743

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11336

Aktan, G. B., Kumpfer, K. L., & Turner, C. W. (1996). Effectiveness of a family skills training program for substance use prevention with inner city African-American families. Substance Use & Misuse, 31(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089609045805

Aktan, G. B. (1999). A cultural consistency evaluation of a substance abuse prevention program with inner city African-American families. Journal of Primary Prevention, 19(3), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022699927549

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11337

Allen, M. L., Garcia-Huidobro, D., Hurtado, G. A., Allen, R., Davey, C. S., Forster, J. L., Hurtado, M., Lopez-Petrovich, K., Marczak, M., Reynoso, U., Trebs, L., & Svetaz, M. V. (2012). Immigrant family skills-building to prevent tobacco use in Latino youth: Study protocol for a community-based participatory randomized controlled trial. Trials, 13, 242. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-242

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11338

Alvarado, R., & Kumpfer, K. L. (2000). Strengthening America’s families. Juvenile Justice, 7(2), 8–18. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/juvejstc7&div=17&id=&page=

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 11339

Annan, J., Sim, A., Puffer, E. S., Salhi, C., & Betancourt, T. S. (2017). Improving mental health outcomes of Burmese migrant and displaced children in Thailand: A community-based randomized controlled trial of a parenting and family skills intervention. Prevention Science, 18(7), 793-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0728-2

Puffer, E. S., Annan, J., Sim, A. L., Salhi, C., & Betancourt, T. S. (2017). The impact of a family skills training intervention among Burmese migrant families in Thailand: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 12(3), e0172611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172611

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11341

Ayer, L., Setodji, C., Schultz, D., Jaycox, L. H., & Kofner, A. (2017). Change in externalizing problems over time among ethnic minority youth exposed to violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.09.010

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11344

Beach, S. R. H., Barton, A. W., Lei, M. K., Mandara, J., Wells, A. C., Kogan, S. M., & Brody, G. H. (2016). Decreasing substance use risk among African American Youth: Parent-based mechanisms of change. Prevention Science, 17(5), 572-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0651-6

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11345

Bobrowski, K. J., Pisarska, A., Staszewski, K. O., & Borucka, A. (2014). Effectiveness of alcohol prevention program for pre-adolescents. Psychiatria Polska, 48(3), 527-539. http://www.psychiatriapolska.pl/uploads/images/PP_3_2014/527Bobrowski_PsychiatrPol2014v48i3.pdf

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11346

Boyas, J. F., Villarreal-Otálora, T., & Marsiglia, F. F. (2019). Alcohol use among Latinx early adolescents: Exploring the role of the family. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 63(2), 35-58.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11347

Brincks, A., Perrino, T., Howe, G., Pantin, H., Prado, G., Huang, S., Cruden, G., & Brown, C. H. (2018). Preventing youth internalizing symptoms through the Familias Unidas intervention: Examining variation in response. Prevention Science, 19(Suppl 1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0666-z

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11348

Burn, M., Lewis, A., McDonald, L., & Toumbourou, J. W. (2019). An Australian adaptation of the Strengthening Families Program: Parent and child mental health outcomes from a pilot study. Australian Psychologist, 54(4), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12385

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11350

Catalano, R. F., Gainey, R. R., Fleming, C. B., Haggerty, K. P., & Johnson, N. O. (1999). An experimental intervention with families of substance abusers: One-year follow-up of the focus on families project. Addiction, 94(2), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9422418.x

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11351

Chartier, K. G., Negroni, L. K., & Hesselbrock, M. N. (2010). Strengthening family practices for Latino families. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work: Innovation in Theory, Research & Practice, 19(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313200903531982

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11358

Fang, L., Schinke, S. P., & Cole, K. C. A. (2010). Preventing substance use among early Asian–American adolescent girls: Initial evaluation of a web-based, mother–daughter program. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47(5), 529-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.03.011

Fang, L., & Schinke, S. P. (2013). Two-year outcomes of a randomized, family-based substance use prevention trial for Asian American adolescent girls. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(3), 788-798. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030925

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11361

Gonzales, N. A., Jensen, M., Tein, J. Y., Wong, J. J., Dumka, L. E., & Mauricio, A. M. (2018). Effect of middle school interventions on alcohol misuse and abuse in Mexican American high school adolescents: Five-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(5), 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0058

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11363

Gottfredson, D., Kumpfer, K., Polizzi-Fox, D., Wilson, D., Puryear, V., Beatty, P., & Vilmenay, M. (2006). The strengthening Washington D.C. families project: A randomized effectiveness trial of family-based prevention. Prevention Science, 7(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0017-y

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11367

Halmi, A., & Golik-Gruber, V. (2002). The prevention and reduction of the consumption of alcohol and any other drugs among a high-risk group of youths through improving family resilience. Alcoholism, 38(1-2), 41-55.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 11368

Harrison, S., Boyle, S. W., & Farley, O. W. (1999). Evaluating the outcomes of a family-based intervention for troubled children: A pretest-posttest study. Research on Social Work Practice, 9(6), 640-655. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F104973159900900602

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11369

Henderson, J. L., Brownlie, E. B., McMain, S., Chaim, G., Wolfe, D. A., Rush, B., Boritz, T., & Beitchman, J. H. (2019). Enhancing prevention and intervention for youth concurrent mental health and substance use disorders: The research and action for teens study. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 13(1), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12458

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11370

Hernandez, L., & Lucero, E. (1996). DAYS La Familia community drug and alcohol prevention program: Family-centered model for working with inner-city Hispanic families. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 16 (3), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407425

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11374

Dray, J., Bowman, J., Campbell, E., Freund, M., Hodder, R., Wolfenden, L., Richards, J., Leane, C., Green, S., Lecathelinais, C., Oldmeadow, C., Attia, J., Gillham, K., & Wiggers, J. (2017). Effectiveness of a pragmatic school-based universal intervention targeting student resilience protective factors in reducing mental health problems in adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 57, 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.03.009

Hodder, R. K., Freund, M., Bowman, J., Wolfenden, L., Campbell, E., Wye, P., Hazell, T., Gillham, K., & Wiggers, J. (2012). A cluster randomised trial of a school-based resilience intervention to decrease tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use in secondary school students: Study protocol. BMC Public Health, 12, 1009. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1009

Dray, J., Bowman, J., Freund, M., Campbell, E., Wolfenden, L., Hodder, R. K., & Wiggers, J. (2014). Improving adolescent mental health and resilience through a resilience-based intervention in schools: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 15(289). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-289

Dray, J., Bowman, J., Freund, M., Campbell, E., Hodder, R. K., Lecathelinais, C., & Wiggers, J. (2016). Mental health problems in a regional population of Australian adolescents: Association with socio-demographic characteristics. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 10(32). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-016-0120-9

Hodder, R. K., Freund, M., Bowman, J., Wolfenden, L., Gillham, K., Dray, J., & Wiggers, J. (2016). Association between adolescent tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use and individual and environmental resilience protective factors. BMJ Open, 6(e012688). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012688

Hodder, R. K., Freund, M., Bowman, J., Wolfenden, L., Campbell, E., Dray, J., Lecathelinais, C., Oldmeadow, C., Attia, J., & Wiggers, J. (2017). Effectiveness of a pragmatic schoolbased universal resilience intervention in reducing tobacco, alcohol and illicit substance use in a population of adolescents: Cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 7(e016060). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016060

McLaren, N., Kamper, S. J., Hodder, R., Wiggers, J., Wolfenden, L., Bowman, J., Campbell, E., Dray, J., & Williams, C. M. (2017). Increased substance use and poorer mental health in adolescents with problematic musculoskeletal pain. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 47(10), 705-711. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2017.7441

Hodder, R. K., Freund, M., Bowman, J., Wolfenden, L., Campbell, E., Dray, J., Lecathelinais, C., Oldmeadow, C., Attia, J., & Wiggers, J. (2018). Differential intervention effectiveness of a universal school-based resilience intervention in reducing adolescent substance use within student subgroups: Exploratory assessment within a cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 8(e021047), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021047

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11377

Johnson, K., Bryant, D. D., Collins, D. A., Noe, T. D., Strader, T. N., & Berbaum, M. (1998). Preventing and reducing alcohol and other drug use among high-risk youths by increasing family resilience. Social Work, 43(4), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/43.4.297

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11378

Kameoka, V. A. (1996). The effects of a family-focused intervention on reducing risk for substance abuse among Asian and Pacific-Islander youths and families: Evaluation of the strengthening Hawaii’s families project. Social Welfare Evaluation and Research Unit, School of Social Work, University of Hawaii.

Kameoka, V.A. (1996). Psychometric evaluation of measures for assessing the effectiveness of a family-focused substance abuse prevention intervention among Pacific Island families and children. Cultural Competence Series, Responding to Pacific Islanders: Culturally Competent Perspectives for Substance Abuse Prevention, CSAP/HRSA Special Collaborative Edition #8.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 11379

Koutakis, N., Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2008). Reducing youth alcohol drinking through a parent-targeted intervention: the Orebro Prevention Program. Addiction, 103(10), 1629-1637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02326.x

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11380

Kumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R., Tait, C., & Turner, C. (2002). Effectiveness of school-based family and children’s skills training for substance abuse prevention among 6-8 year old rural children. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(4), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-64X.16.4S.S65

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11381

Kumpfer, K. L., Ahearn Green, J., Cofrin, K. & Whiteside, H. (2007). Three year evaluation of the New Jersey Strengthening Families Program. LutraGroup.

Kumpfer, K. L., Greene, J. A., Bates, R. F., Cofrin, K., & Whiteside, H. (2007). State of New Jersey DHS Division of Addiction Services Strengthening Families Program substance abuse prevention initiative: Year three evaluation report (Reporting period: July 1, 2004-June 30, 2007). LutraGroup.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 11382

Kumpfer, K. L. (2008). Why are there no effective child abuse prevention parenting interventions? Substance Use & Misuse, 43(8-9), 1262-1265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080802215114

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11383

Kumpfer, K. L., Whiteside, H. O., Greene, J. A., & Allen, K. C. (2010). Effectiveness outcomes of four age versions of the Strengthening Families Program in statewide field sites. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(3), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020602 

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 11385

Kumpfer, K. L., & Brown, J. L. (2019). A parenting behavior intervention (the Strengthening Families Program) for families: Noninferiority trial of different program delivery methods. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 2(2), e14751. https://doi.org/10.2196/14751

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 11388

Magalhães, C., & Kumpfer, K. L. (2015). Effectiveness of culturally adapted Strengthening Families Programme 6-11 years among Portuguese families. Journal of Children's Services, 10(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-02-2014-0010

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 11389

Mauricio, A. M., Gonzales, N. A., & Sandler, I. N. (2018). Preventive parenting interventions: Advancing conceptualizations of participation and enhancing reach. Prevention Science, 19(5), 603-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0876-7

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11391

Miller, A. L., Perryman, J., Markovitz, L., Franzen, S., Cochran, S., & Brown, S. (2013). Strengthening incarcerated families: Evaluating a pilot program for children of incarcerated parents and their caregivers. Family Relations, 62(4), 584-596. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12029

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 11392

Mindel, C. H., & Hoefer, R. A. (2006). An evaluation of a family strengthening program for substance abuse offenders. Journal of Social Service Research, 32(4), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v32n04_02

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 11394

Moral Jiménez, M. D. L. V., Rodríguez Díaz, F. J., Ovejero Bernal, A., & Sirvent Ruiz, C. (2009). Attitudinal changes and reduction of alcohol use in adolescents following a psychosocial intervention program. Adicciones, 21(3), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.231

This study is ineligible for review because it is not available in English (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.3).

Study 11395

Morgenstern, M., Wiborg, G., Isensee, B., & Hanewinkel, R. (2009). School-based alcohol education: Results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 104(3), 402-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02471.x

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11396

Onrust, S. & Bool, M. (2006). Evaluation of the Cursus Gezin aan Bod: The Dutch adaptation of the Strengthening Families Program (SFP 12-16). Trimbos Institute.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 11398

Orte, C., Touza, C., Ballester, L., & March, M. (2008). Children of drug-dependent parents: Prevention programme outcomes. Educational Research, 50(3), 249-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802309390

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11399

Orte, C., Ballester, L., March, M. X., Amer, J., Vives, M., & Pozo, R. (2015). The Strengthening Families Programme in Spain: A long-term evaluation. Journal of Children's Services, 10(2), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-03-2013-0010

Orte, C., Ballester, L., & March, M. X. (2013). The Family Competence Approach: An experience of socio-educational work with families. Revista Interuniversitaria, 21, 13-37. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2013.21.1

Orte, C., Ballester, Ll., March, M. X., Oliver, J. L. I., Pascual, B., & Gomila, M. A. (2015). Development of prosocial behaviour in children after the improvement of family competencies. Journal of Children's Services, 10(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-02-2014-0013

Orte-Socias, C., Ballester-Brage, Ll., Pozo-Gordaliza, R., Vives-Barcelo, M. (2015). Maintaining changes in an evidence-based family prevention program: A longitudinal study of families. Pedagogia Social, https://doi.org/10.SE7179/PSRI_2017.29.08

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11401

Pettersson, C., Özdemir, M., & Eriksson, C. (2011). Effects of a parental program for preventing underage drinking: The NGO program Strong and Clear. BMC Public Health, 11, 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-251

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11402

Pollock, M. D., & Green, S. L. (2015). Effects of a rural family drug treatment court collaborative on child welfare outcomes: Comparison using propensity score analysis. Child Welfare, 94(4), 139-160. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48623248

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 11404

Roehrig, C., & Pradier, C. (2017). Strengthening Families Program: Key points for the French adaptation. Sante Publique, 29(5), 643-653. https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.175.0643

This study is ineligible for review because it is not available in English (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.3).

Study 11410

Brook, J., Akin, B. A., Lloyd, M., Bhattarai, J., & McDonald, T. P. (2016). The use of prospective versus retrospective pretests with child-welfare involved families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(9), 2740-2752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0446-1

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible study design (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.4).

Study 11414

Zweben, J. E., Moses, Y., Cohen, J. B., Price, G., Chapman, W., & Lamb, J. (2015). Enhancing family protective factors in residential treatment for substance use disorders. Child Welfare, 94(5), 145-166.

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 12929

Brook, J., Akin, B. A., Lloyd, M. H., & Yan, Y. (2015). Family Drug Court, targeted parent training and family reunification: Did this enhanced service strategy make a difference? Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 66(2), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12028

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).

Study 12931

Greene, J. A., Kumpfer, K. L., Cofrin, K. A., & Xie J. (2011). Strengthening Families Program Initiative: 2011 evaluation report. Advantage Counseling Services.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 12932

Greene, J. A., & Cofrin, K. A. (2015). Strengthening Families Program Initiative: 2014-2015 evaluation report. Mount Rogers Community Services Board.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 12933

Greene, J. A., & Cofrin, K. A. (2015). Strengthening Families Program Initiative: 2014-2015 evaluation report. Horizon Behavioral Health Child & Family Parent Center.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 12934

Greene, J. A., Kumpfer, K. L., Cofrin, K. A., & Xie, J. (2015). Strengthening Families Program Initiative: 2014-2015 evaluation report. Catholic Charities/Pierre Toussaint Center.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 12935

Greene, J. A., & Cofrin, K. A. (2019). Strengthening Families Program Initiative: Year 6 evaluation report. Children's Trust of South Carolina.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 12936

Greene, J. A. (2020). Strengthening Families Program Initiative: Year 10 Evaluation Report. Prevent Child Abuse North Carolina.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 12937

Greene, J. A., & Cofrin, K. A. (2020). Strengthening Families Program Initiative: 2019-2020 evaluation report. Boys & Girls Clubs of Broward County.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 12938

Greene, J. A., & Cofrin, K. A. (2020). Strengthening Families Program Initiative: Year 7 evaluation report. Children's Trust of South Carolina.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 12940

Kumpfer, K. L., Greene, J. A., Bates, R. F., Cofrin, K., Whiteside, H. O. (2006). State of New Jersey Strengthening Families Program Substance Abuse Prevention Initiative: Year Two program evaluation report. Lutra Group.

This study is ineligible for review because it does not use an eligible publication source (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.2).

Study 12942

Marek, L. I., Brock, D-J. P., & Sullivan, R. (2006). Cultural adaptations to a family life skills program: Implementation in rural Appalachia. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 27(2), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-0017-5

This study is ineligible for review because it is not a study of the program or service under review (Study Eligibility Criterion 4.1.6).